Red Hat Linux OS and other open source products

Don't miss out!

Thousands of developers use stack.watch to stay informed.
Get an email whenever new security vulnerabilities are reported in any Red Hat product.

RSS Feeds for Red Hat security vulnerabilities

Create a CVE RSS feed including security vulnerabilities found in Red Hat products with stack.watch. Just hit watch, then grab your custom RSS feed url.

Products by Red Hat Sorted by Most Security Vulnerabilities since 2018

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)1788 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server1534 vulnerabilities
RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Server. Includes software bundeled with RHEL server.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation1504 vulnerabilities
RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Workstation. Includes software bundled with RHEL Workstation.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop1493 vulnerabilities
RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Desktop. Includes software bundled with RHEL desktop

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Aus884 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Eus800 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Tus701 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Eus414 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Openshift319 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Openshift Container Platform230 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Satellite226 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhel Eus223 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Openstack216 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Jboss Enterprise Application Platform181 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhel E4s153 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhel Tus136 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhel Aus136 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Build Keycloak134 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Software Collections123 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Keycloak123 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Virtualization115 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Ibm Z Systems108 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Power Little Endian103 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Single Sign On95 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Power Little Endian Eus88 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhel Els86 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Ibm Z Systems Eus82 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Hummingbird72 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Jboss Fuse71 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Scientific Computing71 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Ansible Tower69 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Single Sign On65 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Power Little Endian Update Services Sap Solutions61 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Jboss Data Grid60 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Ceph Storage59 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Jbosseapxp59 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhel Eus Long Life56 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Libvirt55 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform53 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Virtualization Host53 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Power Big Endian45 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux For Real Time43 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Update Services Sap Solutions43 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Quay42 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Ansible42 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux For Arm 6442 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Aus41 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Kafka40 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Undertow40 vulnerabilities
Java HTTP Server and Servlet Container

Red Hat Rhivos38 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Openstack Platform38 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Real Time Nfv37 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Storage37 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Openshift Application Runtimes36 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Jboss Core Services35 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform33 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhev Hypervisor33 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Discovery33 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Arm 64 Eus33 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Linux32 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Quarkus30 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Cloudforms30 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Http Server29 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Directory Server29 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Satellite Capsule27 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhosemc27 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Advanced Virtualization26 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Codeready Linux Builder26 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Developer24 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update Services Sap Solutions24 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Insights Proxy24 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Real Time Nfv Tus22 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Fuse22 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Inside21 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Openshift Service Mesh21 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Real Time Tus21 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Codeready Linux Builder Eus21 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Integration Camel K20 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Tus20 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Ai Inference Server19 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Process Automation19 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Power Big Endian Eus19 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Wildfly19 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Camel Spring Boot18 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Integration18 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Logging18 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Rhui18 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Jboss Enterprise Web Server17 vulnerabilities

Red Hat Camel Quarkus17 vulnerabilities

Recent Red Hat Security Advisories

Advisory	Title	Published
RHSA-2026:25534	(RHSA-2026:25534) Critical: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update	June 12, 2026
RHSA-2026:25533	(RHSA-2026:25533) Critical: kernel security update	June 12, 2026
RHSA-2026:25520	(RHSA-2026:25520) Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update	June 12, 2026
RHSA-2026:25143	(RHSA-2026:25143) Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update	June 12, 2026
RHSA-2026:25145	(RHSA-2026:25145) Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update	June 12, 2026
RHSA-2026:25381	(RHSA-2026:25381) Important: flatpak security update	June 11, 2026
RHSA-2026:25341	(RHSA-2026:25341) Important: tomcat9 update	June 11, 2026
RHSA-2026:25273	(RHSA-2026:25273) Important: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes v2.16.2 security update	June 11, 2026
RHSA-2026:25271	(RHSA-2026:25271) multicluster engine for Kubernetes v2.11.0 General Availability	June 11, 2026
RHSA-2026:25253	(RHSA-2026:25253) Important: runc security update	June 11, 2026

By the Year

In 2026 there have been 1127 vulnerabilities in Red Hat with an average score of 7.0 out of ten. Last year, in 2025 Red Hat had 1138 security vulnerabilities published. If vulnerabilities keep coming in at the current rate, it appears that number of security vulnerabilities in Red Hat in 2026 could surpass last years number. However, the average CVE base score of the vulnerabilities in 2026 is greater by 0.45.

Year	Vulnerabilities	Average Score
2026	1127	7.01
2025	1138	6.56
2024	1685	6.57
2023	1206	6.75
2022	1362	6.97
2021	1123	6.62
2020	663	6.39
2019	772	6.98
2018	760	7.16

It may take a day or so for new Red Hat vulnerabilities to show up in the stats or in the list of recent security vulnerabilities. Additionally vulnerabilities may be tagged under a different product or component name.

Recent Red Hat Security Vulnerabilities

CVE	Date	Vulnerability	Products
CVE-2026-54231	Jun 13, 2026	Content Injection in libreport ABRT handler via unsanitized journal logs A content injection vulnerability was found in the ABRT post-create event handler scripts in libreport. The event script queries the systemd journal for log entries matching the crashed process and writes the results to files in the dump directory without sanitizing embedded control characters. A local user can inject arbitrary content into the journal output by embedding newline characters in syslog messages, controlling the content that root writes to dump directory files.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-54230	Jun 13, 2026	Symlink Following in libreport postcreate Scripts Enables Arbitrary File Overwrite A symlink following vulnerability was found in the ABRT post-create event handler scripts in libreport. Event scripts write output files using shell redirections without the O_NOFOLLOW flag. If the target file is replaced with a symlink, the shell process running as root follows the symlink and writes content to the symlink target, allowing arbitrary file overwrites on the system.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-54229	Jun 13, 2026	Race Condition in abrt-dbus ChownProblemDir Enables Privilege Escalation A race condition was found in the abrt-dbus D-Bus service's ChownProblemDir method. ChownProblemDir opens the dump directory with DD_OPEN_READONLY and calls dd_chown to change ownership of all files to the caller's uid, succeeding even while post-create event handlers hold a write lock. This allows an attacker to gain filesystem-level control of the dump directory while privileged event scripts are still running.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-54228	Jun 13, 2026	Red Hat ABRT D-Bus SetElement TOCTOU A time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition was found in the abrt-dbus D-Bus service's SetElement method. Between dump directory creation and post-create event execution, any local user can call SetElement to write arbitrary text files into the root-owned dump directory, bypassing package validation and allowing crashes of unpackaged binaries to survive post-create processing.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-48914	Jun 12, 2026	QEMU virtio-blk OOB Write via Malformed SCSI A flaw was found in QEMU's virtio-blk device. The issue arises because the device does not properly validate the size of input descriptors before writing data. A malicious guest with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a malformed virtio-blk SCSI request, leading to an out-of-bounds write in the host heap memory and a potential denial of service (DoS) for the QEMU process.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Enterprise Linux Nvidia Openshift And others...
CVE-2026-53702	Jun 11, 2026	GStreamer H.265 Parser Stack Buffer Overflow via SEI Loop Index A stack buffer overflow flaw was found in the GStreamer H.265 codec parser library (gst-plugins-bad). When parsing a buffering period SEI message, the parser uses an incorrect loop bound derived from cpb_cnt_minus1[i] (the loop index) instead of the sub-layer 0 CPB count cpb_cnt_minus1[0] from the referenced Sequence Parameter Set. A crafted H.265 video file or stream can cause the parser to write beyond the bounds of stack-allocated CPB delay arrays, resulting in a crash or potential stack memory corruption.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-53701	Jun 11, 2026	GStreamer gst-plugins-bad: H.266/VVC PPS parser OOB write An out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in GStreamer's H.266/VVC PPS picture partition parser in gst-plugins-bad. In the multi-slice-in-tile processing of gst_h266_parser_parse_picture_partition() (gsth266parser.c), the loop iterates without checking that the slice index stays within bounds, writing past three fixed-size arrays (slice_height_in_ctus, slice_top_left_ctu_x, slice_top_left_ctu_y) in the GstH266PPS structure. While the initial proof-of-concept demonstrated a 4-byte out-of-bounds write, the code permits larger writes across multiple iterations. A crafted H.266/VVC media file can trigger this vulnerability.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11774	Jun 11, 2026	389-Ds SASL_IO Integer Overflow: DoS/RCE via Crafted Packet An integer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), adding sizeof(uint32_t) to a crafted SASL packet length prefix of 0xFFFFFFFC causes unsigned wraparound to zero, bypassing the nsslapd-maxsasliosize limit and leading to a heap buffer overflow of up to approximately 2 megabytes of attacker-controlled data. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF > 0), a remote attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE). In FreeIPA and Red Hat Identity Management deployments, any domain user with a valid Kerberos ticket, enrolled host, or service account can trigger this vulnerability over the network. This flaw is independent of CVE-2025-14905, which patched schema.c only and did not modify sasl_io.c.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-49261	Jun 11, 2026	MariaDB Server <10.6.27, <10.11.18 Exec via wsrep_notify_cmd MariaDB server is a community developed fork of MySQL server. Versions 10.6.1 through 10.6.26, 10.11.1 through 10.11.17, 11.4.1 through 11.4.11, 11.8.1 through 11.8.7, and 12.3.1 with `wsrep_notify_cmd` enabled would execute shell commands embedded in the name of the joiner node. This is fixed in 10.6.27, 10.11.18, 11.4.12, 11.8.8, and 12.3.2. As a workaround, anyone who cannot upgrade now should disable `wsrep_notify_cmd`.
CVE-2026-11986	Jun 11, 2026	Privilege Escalation in Keycloak admin-ui-ext Bulk Role-Removal A flaw was found in the admin-ui-ext component of Keycloak, which provides extended administrative user interface capabilities. The issue occurs because certain bulk role-removal endpoints fail to perform granular permission checks when deleting role mappings. This allows a delegated administrator with limited permissions to remove highly privileged roles from other users or groups, potentially disrupting administrative access control.	Build Keycloak Jbosseapxp
CVE-2026-11850	Jun 11, 2026	Integer Underflow in MIT krb5 LDAP KDB to Heap OOB Read An integer underflow vulnerability was found in MIT krb5 in the berval2tl_data() function in plugins/kdb/ldap/libkdb_ldap/ldap_principal2.c. The function performs an unsigned subtraction (bv_len - 2) without a prior bounds check. When bv_len is 0 or 1, the subtraction wraps to a large value which is then truncated to uint16_t, yielding 0xFFFE (65534) or 0xFFFF (65535). The subsequent malloc succeeds and memcpy reads up to 65534 bytes from a 0-1 byte buffer, resulting in a heap out-of-bounds read. The attack vector involves a malicious or compromised LDAP KDB backend returning a krbExtraData attribute with bv_len < 2, triggering the underflow when the KDC or kadmind reads principal data.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Hummingbird Openshift And others...
CVE-2026-6893	Jun 10, 2026	Command Injection via Unescaped DHCP Options in dracut Legacy Path A flaw was found in dracut. A remote attacker on the adjacent network can exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) options, such as a malicious hostname, to a system using dracut's legacy DHCP path. These options are improperly handled and written into temporary shell scripts without proper escaping, leading to command injection. This allows the attacker to achieve root code execution within the initramfs, potentially compromising the system's boot and network behavior.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Hummingbird Openshift And others...
CVE-2026-11884	Jun 10, 2026	389 DS Heap Buffer Overflow via OC_SUP Field Length Omission A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. When serializing objectclass definitions, the oc_superior (SUP) field length is omitted from buffer size calculations in read_schema_dse() and schema_oc_to_string(), but the field is still written via strcat(). An attacker with Directory Manager privileges, or a compromised replication supplier, can trigger a server crash by creating objectclasses with long SUP values. This is an incomplete fix variant of CVE-2025-14905.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11837	Jun 10, 2026	ansible authorized_key LPE via untrusted symlink A local privilege escalation vulnerability was found in the ansible.posix authorized_key module. The module's keyfile() function uses os.chown() instead of os.lchown() and opens files without O_NOFOLLOW when managing SSH authorized keys. An unprivileged local user can pre-stage symbolic links in their ~/.ssh directory to redirect file ownership changes to arbitrary system paths when an operator runs the authorized_key task as root, leading to local privilege escalation.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Openstack
CVE-2026-45591	Jun 09, 2026	Jun 2026: ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability Uncontrolled resource consumption in ASP.NET Core allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
CVE-2026-45491	Jun 09, 2026	Jun 2026: .NET Tampering Vulnerability Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally.
CVE-2026-45447	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL PKCS#7 UAF via PKCS7_verify(); FIPS 3.6+ safe Issue summary: A specially crafted PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed message could trigger a use-after-free during PKCS#7 signature verification. Impact summary: A use-after-free may result in process crashes, heap corruption, or potentially remote code execution. When processing a PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed message, if the SignedData digestAlgorithms field is present as an empty ASN.1 SET, OpenSSL may incorrectly free a caller-owned BIO during PKCS7_verify(). A subsequent use of the BIO by the calling application results in a use-after-free condition. In the common case this occurs when the application later calls BIO_free() on the BIO originally passed to PKCS7_verify(). Depending on allocator behavior and application-specific BIO usage patterns, this may result in a crash or other memory corruption. In some application contexts this may potentially be exploitable for remote code execution. Applications that process PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed messages using OpenSSL PKCS#7 APIs may be affected. Applications using the CMS APIs for this processing are not affected. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-45446	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL EVP Provider: AESSIV/AESGCMSIV Auth Forger via Empty AAD/Ciphertext (<3.2) Issue summary: The implementations of AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) mishandle the authentication of AAD (Additional Authenticated Data) with an empty ciphertext allowing a forgery of such messages. Impact summary: An attacker can forge empty messages with arbitrary AAD to the victim's application using these ciphers. AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) are nonce-misuse-resistant AEAD modes: they accept a key, nonce, optional AAD (bytes that are authenticated but not encrypted), and plaintext, and produces ciphertext plus a 16-byte tag. On decrypt, `EVP_DecryptFinal_ex()` is documented to return success only if the tag is verified succesfully. In OpenSSL's provider implementation of these ciphers, the expected tag is computed only when decryption function is invoked with non-empty data. If the caller supplies AAD and then calls `EVP_DecryptFinal_ex()` without invocation of the ciphertext update, which can happen when the received ciphertext length is zero, the tag is never recalculated and still holds its all-zeros value. When AES-GCM-SIV is used, an attacker who sends arbitrary AAD, empty ciphertext, and all-zeros tag passes authentication under any key they do not know, single-shot. When AES-SIV is used, for mounting the attack it's necessary for the application to reuse the decryption context without resetting the key. AES-SIV is implemented since OpenSSL 3.0. AES-GCM-SIV is implemented since OpenSSL 3.2. No protocols implemented in OpenSSL itself (TLS/CMS/PKCS7/HPKE/QUIC) support either AES-GCM-SIV or AES-SIV. To mount an attack, the applications must implement their own protocol and use the EVP interface. Also they must skip the ciphertext update when a message with an empty ciphertext arrives. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as these algorithms are not FIPS approved and the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-45445	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL EVP_Cipher One-Shot API Discards IV causing AES-OCB nonce reuse Issue summary: When an application drives an AES-OCB context through the public EVP_Cipher() one-shot interface, the application-supplied initialisation vector (IV) is silently discarded. Impact summary: Every message encrypted under the same key uses the same effective nonce regardless of the IV supplied by the caller, resulting in (key, nonce) reuse and loss of confidentiality. If the same code path is used to compute the authentication tag, the tag depends only on the (key, IV) pair and not on the plaintext or ciphertext, allowing universal forgery of arbitrary ciphertext from a single captured message. OpenSSL provides two ways to drive a cipher: the documented streaming interface (EVP_CipherUpdate / EVP_CipherFinal_ex) and a lower-level one-shot, EVP_Cipher(), whose documentation explicitly recommends against use by applications in favour of EVP_CipherUpdate() and EVP_CipherFinal_ex(). The OCB provider's streaming handler flushes the application-supplied IV into the OCB context before processing data; the one-shot handler did not. Every call to EVP_Cipher() on an AES-OCB context therefore ran with the all-zero key-derived offset state left by cipher initialisation, regardless of the caller's IV. If EVP_EncryptFinal_ex() is subsequently used to obtain the authentication tag, the deferred IV setup runs at that point and clears the running checksum that should have been accumulated over the plaintext. The resulting tag is a function of (key, IV) only and verifies against any ciphertext produced under the same (key, IV) pair. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected: AES-OCB is not a TLS cipher suite, and libssl does not call EVP_Cipher() in any case. Applications that drive AES-OCB through the documented streaming AEAD API (EVP_CipherUpdate / EVP_CipherFinal_ex) are not affected. Only applications that combine the AES-OCB cipher with the EVP_Cipher() one-shot API are vulnerable. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as AES-OCB is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-42770	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL FIPS 3.0-4.0 DHX X9.42 subgroup check flaw Issue summary: When EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42) peer key, the peer key is not properly checked for the subgroup membership. Impact summary: A malicious peer which presents an X9.42 key carrying the victim's p and g parameters, a forged q = r (a small prime factor of the cofactor (p1)/q_local), and a public value Y of order r can recover the victim's private key after a small number of key exchange attempts. When EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42) peer key, the subgroup membership check Y^q 1 (mod p) is performed using the peer's own q parameter, not the local key's q. The peer's domain parameters are then matched against the domain parameters of the private key, but the value of q is not compared. A malicious peer who presents an X9.42 key carrying the victim's p, g, a forged q = r (a small prime factor of the cofactor), and a public value Y of order r passes all checks. The shared secret then takes only r distinct values, leaking priv mod r. Repeating for each small-prime factor of the cofactor and combining via CRT recovers the full private key (LimLee / small-subgroup-confinement attack). The realistic attack surface is narrow: principally CMP deployments with long-lived RA/CA DHX keys and bespoke enterprise or government applications using X9.42 DHX static keys with interactive protocols and therefore this issue was assigned Low severity. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are affected by this issue.
CVE-2026-42769	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL CMP Root CA Key Update Validation Bypass RA Cred Escalation Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) message response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which could lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA) level to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level. Impact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA certificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate. One of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in RFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover, which is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'. As part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA certificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its signature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the new one. The 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with OSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld' certificate. A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding an incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the certificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual (only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts of the verification code). An attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message protection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed certificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP clients would accept as a new trust anchor. Significant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials) are the reason the issue was assigned Low severity. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-42768	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL <3.2 CMS PKCS7 Bleichenbacher Oracle Issue summary: The CMS_decrypt and PKCS7_decrypt functions are vulnerable to Bleichenbacher-style attack when an attacker is able to provide the CMS or S/MIME messages and observe the error code and/or decryption output. Impact summary: The Bleichenbacher-style attack allows an attacker to use the victim's vulnerable application as a way to decrypt or sign messages with the victim's private RSA key. The attack is possible in 2 variants. 1. The decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is used without providing the recipient certificate. In this case OpenSSL iterates over every KeyTransRecipientInfo (KTRI) without stopping at the first success. An attacker who authors a message with two KTRI entries the first one wrapping a real CEK under the victim's public key, the second with an arbitrary probe ciphertext obtains opportunity to iterate the 2nd KTRI to get a valid PKCS#1 v1.5 padding if the error code of the application is available. That is a Bleichenbacher oracle (Bleichenbacher, CRYPTO '98): an adaptive-chosen-ciphertext side channel from which the attacker decrypts any RSA ciphertext to the victim's key or forges any PKCS#1 v1.5 signature under it. 2. When the decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is provided with the recipient certificate, and the recipient is not found, a random key is substituted. An attacker who authors a message and is able to compare both error code and the result of the decryption, can mount a Bleichenbacher oracle. We are not aware of any applications that provide a remote attacker an opportunity to mount an attack described in these scenarios. We consider the existence of such application very unlikely, and for this reason this CVE has been evaluated as Low severity. To avoid these attacks, when RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 Key Transport is in use, the invoked EVP_PKEY_decrypt() will use the implicit rejection mechanism described in draft-irtf-cfrg-rsa-guidance. In previous OpenSSL releases the implicit rejection was explicitly disabled. The implicit rejection mechanism always returns a plaintext value, the symmetric key. This result is deterministic for the ciphertext and the private key. The length of the decryption result can happen to match the length of the key of the symmetric cipher that was used for the content encryption. When a certificate is not provided, the last RecipientInfo producing a key that looks valid will be used. It may cause getting garbage content on decryption. As a proper way to deal with this a recipient certificate has to be provided to identify the particular RecipientInfo for decryption. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, and 3.4 are not affected by this issue, as CMS and S/MIME processing happens outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-42767	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL CMP Client Null Deref DoS (pre-3.5) via crafted EncryptedValue OID Issue summary: An attacker-controlled CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) server could trigger a NULL pointer dereference in a CMP client application. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference causes a crash of the application and a Denial of Service. An attacker controlling a CMP server (or acting as a man-in-the-middle) could craft a CMP response containing a CRMF (Certificate Request Message Format) CertRepMessage with an EncryptedValue structure where the symmAlg field has an algorithm OID but no parameters field. When the OpenSSL CMP client processes this response, the NULL dereference occurs, causing a crash of the CMP client. Applications that process untrusted CMP/CRMF messages may be affected. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-42766	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL CMS NULL Deref (before 4.0) - DoS Issue summary: A specially crafted password-encrypted CMS message can trigger a NULL pointer dereference during CMS decryption. Impact summary: This NULL pointer dereference leads to an application crash and a Denial of Service. The CMS PasswordRecipientInfo.keyDerivationAlgorithm field is defined as OPTIONAL in the ASN.1 specification and may therefore be absent in specially crafted inputs. During the password-based CMS decryption the OpenSSL CMS implementation dereferences this field without first checking whether it was present. An attacker who supplies such a CMS message to an application performing password-based CMS decryption can trigger an application crash, leading to a Denial of Service. Applications that process password-encrypted CMS messages may be affected. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-42764	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL QUIC Server NULL ptr deref (addr val disabled) Issue summary: Receiving a QUIC initial packet with an invalid token may trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the OpenSSL QUIC server with address validation disabled. Impact summary: NULL pointer dereference typically causes abnormal termination of the affected QUIC server process and a Denial of Service. If the address validation is disabled in the OpenSSL QUIC server implementation, an attacker can crash the server by sending an initial packet with an invalid or expired token. By default, the client address validation is enabled in the OpenSSL QUIC server implementation, which makes the default configuration not vulnerable to this issue. However if the SSL_LISTENER_FLAG_NO_VALIDATE is used with the SSL_new_listener() call, the address validation is disabled making the vulnerable code reachable. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-34183	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL QUIC Heap Exhaustion via PATH_CHALLENGE Flood (before 4.0) Issue summary: Remote peer may exhaust heap memory of the QUIC server or client by flooding it with packets containing PATH_CHALLENGE frames. Impact summary: A malicious remote peer can cause an unbounded memory allocation which can lead to an abnormal termination of the application acting as a QUIC client or server and a Denial of Service. A remote peer may exhaust heap memory by flooding the local QUIC stack with PATH_CHALLENGE frames. The local QUIC stack allocates a PATH_RESPONSE frame for every PATH_CHALLENGE it receives. The allocated PATH_RESPONSE frame gets freed only when the remote peer acknowledges reception of the PATH_RESPONSE frame which will not be done by a malicious peer. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. The QUIC stack is outside of OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-34182	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL CMS AuthEnvelopedData Cipher/Tag Length Validation Flaw Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success. If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message. In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long, allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2026-34181	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL PKCS#12 PBMAC1 forging CVE-2026-34181 Issue Summary: The PKCS#12 file processing fails to perform sufficient input validation for files that use Password-Based Message Authentication Code 1 (PBMAC1) integrity mechanism allowing a certificate and private key forgery. Impact Summary: An attacker impersonating a user can cause a service reading PKCS#12 files to accept forged certificates and private keys with a 1 in 256 probability. If a service accepting PKCS#12 files is using passwords for authenticating the received files, the attacker can create unencrypted PKCS#12 files that use PBMAC1 authentication that specifies an HMAC key of only one byte, allowing them to craft a file that will be accepted with a 1 in 256 probability. That would then cause the service to accept a certificate and private key controlled by the attacker. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-34180	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL ASN.1 Decoder Heap Buffer Over-Read (1.1.1+) on 64-bit Unix Issue summary: Parsing a crafted DER-encoded ASN.1 structure with a primitive element whose content exceeds 2 gigabytes in length may cause a heap buffer over-read on 64-bit Unix and Unix-like platforms. Impact summary: The heap buffer over-read may crash the application (Denial of Service) or to load into the decoded ASN.1 object contents of memory beyond the end of the input buffer. More typically such ASN.1 elements would instead be truncated. An integer truncation in OpenSSL's ASN.1 decoder causes the content length of an ASN.1 primitive element to be mishandled when it exceeds 2 gigabytes. In the worst case the truncated length is treated as a request to scan the binary content for a terminating zero byte, possibly causing OpenSSL to read either less than or beyond the end of the allocated buffer. Applications that pass attacker-supplied data to d2i_X509(), d2i_PKCS7(), or any other d2i_* decoding function are affected. OpenSSL's own command-line tools are not vulnerable, as data read through the BIO layer is checked before it reaches the affected code. The issue only affects 64-bit Unix and Unix-like platforms; 32-bit platforms and 64-bit Windows are not affected. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-9076	Jun 09, 2026	OPENSSL CMS Heap OOB Read via Stream-Mode KEK in CMS Decrypt Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap) processes attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK cipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key(). Impact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory page boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information disclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker. The key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the RFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped key length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the block length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from an OID carried in the attacker's PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no requirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects a stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer containing the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes specified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen. Applications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password() (equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS data are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the over-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication succeeds. The over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so there is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the allocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal allocator. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2026-7383	Jun 09, 2026	OpenSSL <=3.1: Signed Int Overflow in ASN1_mbstring_ncopy() Heap BOV Issue summary: A signed integer overflow when sizing the destination buffer for Unicode output in ASN1_mbstring_ncopy() can lead to a heap buffer overflow. Impact summary: A heap buffer overflow may lead to a crash or possibly attacker controlled code execution or other undefined behaviour. In ASN1_mbstring_copy() and ASN1_mbstring_ncopy() the destination size for Unicode output is computed in a signed int: by left shift of the input character count for BMPSTRING (UTF-16) and UNIVERSALSTRING (UTF-32), and by summing per-character byte counts for UTF8STRING. The calculation overflows when the input reaches around 2^30 characters. In the worst case (UNIVERSALSTRING at 2^30 characters) the size wraps to zero, OPENSSL_malloc(1) is called, and the subsequent character copy writes several gigabytes past the one-byte allocation. X.509 certificate processing routes through ASN1_STRING_set_by_NID(), whose DIRSTRING_TYPE mask excludes UNIVERSALSTRING and whose per-NID size limits cap the input length; no network protocol or certificate-handling path in OpenSSL exercises the overflow. Triggering the bug requires an application that calls ASN1_mbstring_copy() or ASN1_mbstring_ncopy() directly, or registers a custom string type via ASN1_STRING_TABLE_add(), with attacker-controlled input on the order of half a gigabyte or more. For these reasons this issue was assigned Low severity. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-11792	Jun 09, 2026	389 DS Heap Buffer Overflow in auditlog.c A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. When audit logging is enabled, the create_masked_entry_string() function in auditlog.c copies a fixed-length password mask into a precisely-sized heap buffer without checking available space. If a short cleartext password is logged (requiring non-default CLEAR password storage or a compromised replication peer), the copy overflows the buffer, corrupting heap memory and audit log output.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11793	Jun 09, 2026	389 Directory Server stack buffer overflow in pw.c A stack buffer overflow flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The checkPrefix() function in pw.c copies an attacker-controlled algorithm ID into a 256-byte stack buffer without bounds checking when parsing reversible-encrypted attribute values. An attacker with Directory Manager privileges can crash the LDAP server by storing a crafted credential with an oversized algorithm ID. FORTIFY_SOURCE mitigates this to denial of service only.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11790	Jun 09, 2026	389 DS PBKDF2 SHA256 Iteration Unbounded, CPU DoS Exploit A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The PBKDF2-SHA256 password storage plugin does not enforce an upper bound on the iteration count extracted from stored password hashes. A privileged attacker who can modify a user's password hash can cause excessive CPU consumption during authentication, resulting in denial of service.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11789	Jun 09, 2026	389 DS SMD5 Plugin UInt Underflow Buffer Over-read Crashes LDAP A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The SMD5 password storage plugin performs unsigned integer underflow when computing salt length from a crafted password hash shorter than 16 bytes, causing a buffer over-read that crashes the LDAP server during authentication.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11788	Jun 09, 2026	389 Directory Server Plugin Crash via Deref Control A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The dereference control plugin does not check for allocation failure before using a BER structure, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server when the system is under memory pressure.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11787	Jun 09, 2026	389 Directory Server Heap Overread in LDAP Filter Parsing A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The ldap_utf8prev() function reads bytes before the start of a buffer without bounds checking, causing a heap buffer over-read in string filter parsing that may influence internal filter processing behavior.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11785	Jun 09, 2026	389 DS Type Confusion Leak LDAP Auth Response A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A type confusion in the SSO token extended operation handler causes partial stack address information to be disclosed in LDAP responses to authenticated users.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-11786	Jun 09, 2026	389 DS LDIF Parser OOB Read A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The LDIF parser reads past the end of a heap buffer when processing attribute types with trailing semicolons during database import, causing an out-of-bounds read detectable under memory instrumentation.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-52902	Jun 09, 2026	awxkit YAML !include Path Traversal Vulnerability A path traversal vulnerability was found in awxkit, the CLI tool for AWX. The YAML !include directive does not sanitize file paths, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious YAML file that reads arbitrary YAML-formatted files from the local filesystem when a user imports it using "awx --conf.format yaml import". This is a client-side vulnerability requiring user interaction.	Ansible Automation Platform
CVE-2026-11611	Jun 08, 2026	389 DS CS-Persistent Search Overuse: Unbounded Memory DoS A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The Content Synchronization persistent search plugin allows unbounded memory growth when an authenticated client stops reading sync responses, enabling denial of service. Additional race conditions in plugin thread lifecycle can cause crashes during connection teardown or shutdown.	Directory Server Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-49975	Jun 08, 2026	Apache HTTP Server mod_http DoS via Excessive Memory Allocation (2.4.17-2.4.67) Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server's mod_http leads to denial of service via malicious HTTP requests. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.17 through 2.4.67.
CVE-2026-11577	Jun 08, 2026	Keycloak PartialImport FGAP Escalation via Admin Import A flaw was found in Keycloak. A limited administrator can exploit an improper access control vulnerability in the POST /admin/realms/{realm}/partialImport endpoint. This allows them to bypass Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) and escalate their privileges to a full realm administrator by importing users with realm-admin role mappings.	Build Keycloak Jboss Data Grid Jboss Enterprise Application Platform And others...
CVE-2026-11569	Jun 08, 2026	Quay: Unvalidated Filedrop MIME Allows Stored XSS via SVG A flaw was found in Quay. The filedrop endpoint accepts any mime type without validation, allowing an authenticated user with repository write access to upload a malicious SVG file containing JavaScript. The file is stored and served inline through the CDN, enabling stored cross-site scripting when a victim visits the archive URL.	Quay
CVE-2026-3238	Jun 08, 2026	Samba WINS NULL Deref via UDP (CVE-2026-3238) A flaw was found in Sambas WINS server component when running as an Active Directory Domain Controller. The WINS protocol handlers for certain request types did not properly validate incoming packets, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger a NULL pointer dereference and crash the WINS service using specially crafted UDP packets.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Openshift
CVE-2026-50263	Jun 05, 2026	X.Org X Server AAF in CreateSaverWindow() (Xwayland) A use-after-free flaw was found in the X.Org X server and Xwayland in CreateSaverWindow(). A client can trigger a use-after-free read after changing window attributes and forcing the screen saver, leading to information disclosure.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-50262	Jun 05, 2026	X.Org XServer Xwayland OOB Read __glXDisp_ChangeDrawableAttributes An out-of-bounds read flaw was found in the X.Org X server and Xwayland in __glXDisp_ChangeDrawableAttributes(). A wrong size validation check can read a client-controlled number of bytes, exceeding the request buffer, leading to information disclosure. A write path also exists but requires byte-swapped clients which is disabled by default.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-50264	Jun 05, 2026	X.Org X Server & Xwayland OOB Heap Write via DRI2 Buffers An out-of-bounds write flaw was found in the X.Org X server and Xwayland in DRIGetBuffers/DRIGetBuffersWithFormat. A client that requests multiple DRI2BufferBackLeft attachments and one DRI2BufferFrontLeft can trigger an out-of-bounds heap write. This may be used to crash the server, or for privilege escalation if the X server runs as root.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-50261	Jun 05, 2026	UAF in X.Org X Server XWayland SyncChangeCounter() A use-after-free flaw was found in the X.Org X server and Xwayland in SyncChangeCounter(). A client that sets up multiple SyncCounters can trigger a use-after-free when destroying those counters via a second client connection while changing those counters. This may be used to crash the server, or for privilege escalation if the X server runs as root.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
CVE-2026-50260	Jun 05, 2026	Use-after-free in X.Org X Server via SyncCounters A use-after-free flaw was found in the X.Org X server and Xwayland in FreeCounter(). A client that sets up multiple SyncCounters and awaits on those triggers can trigger a use-after-free when destroying those counters via a second client connection. This may be used to crash the server, or for privilege escalation if the X server runs as root.	Enterprise Linux (RHEL)