2020 Security Vulnerability Report
CVE Statistics for 2020

Growth Curve
There were 17084 security vulnerabilities (CVEs) published in 2020. In 2019 there were 16234.

The average severity was 7.1 out of 10, which decreased by 0.1 from 2019.

Products & Vendors with the most security vulnerabilities published in 2020 Vulnerabilities may exist in multiple products or vendors

By Product

#1

Debian Linux

1013 vulnerabilities in 2020

#2

Fedora Project Fedora

841 vulnerabilities in 2020

#3

Microsoft Windows 10

802 vulnerabilities in 2020

#4

Microsoft Windows Server 2016

790 vulnerabilities in 2020

#5

Microsoft Windows Server 2019

743 vulnerabilities in 2020

#6

Google Android

699 vulnerabilities in 2020

#7

OpenSuse Leap

687 vulnerabilities in 2020

#8

Canonical Ubuntu Linux

683 vulnerabilities in 2020

#9

Microsoft Windows Server 2012

443 vulnerabilities in 2020

#10

Microsoft Windows 8.1

435 vulnerabilities in 2020

#11

Microsoft Windows Rt 8 1

429 vulnerabilities in 2020

#12

Microsoft Windows 7

386 vulnerabilities in 2020

#13

Microsoft Windows Server 2008

382 vulnerabilities in 2020

#14

Apple iOS

252 vulnerabilities in 2020

#15

OpenSuse Backports Sle

237 vulnerabilities in 2020

#16

Apple Mac OSX

237 vulnerabilities in 2020

#17

GitLab

235 vulnerabilities in 2020

#18

Apple iPad OS

231 vulnerabilities in 2020

#19

Google Chrome

227 vulnerabilities in 2020

#20

NetApp Active Iq Unified Manager

210 vulnerabilities in 2020

By Vendor

#1

Microsoft

1193 vulnerabilities in 2020

#2

Debian

1013 vulnerabilities in 2020

#3

Google

987 vulnerabilities in 2020

#4

Oracle

972 vulnerabilities in 2020

#5

Fedora Project

841 vulnerabilities in 2020

#6

OpenSuse

765 vulnerabilities in 2020

#7

Canonical

692 vulnerabilities in 2020

#8

Red Hat

631 vulnerabilities in 2020

#9

Apple

384 vulnerabilities in 2020

#10

NetApp

366 vulnerabilities in 2020

#11

IBM

339 vulnerabilities in 2020

#12

Cisco

324 vulnerabilities in 2020

#13

Adobe

306 vulnerabilities in 2020

#14

GitLab

237 vulnerabilities in 2020

#15
 
F5 Networks

225 vulnerabilities in 2020

#16

SAP

207 vulnerabilities in 2020

#17

Mozilla

180 vulnerabilities in 2020

#18

Jenkins

173 vulnerabilities in 2020

#19

Apache

157 vulnerabilities in 2020

#20

Linux

120 vulnerabilities in 2020

By Weakness

#1
XSS
The software does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
1958
 
11.5%
#2
Memory Corruption
The software writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. Typically, this can result in corruption of data, a crash, or code execution. The software may modify an index or perform pointer arithmetic that references a memory location that is outside of the boundaries of the buffer. A subsequent write operation then produces undefined or unexpected results.
961
 
5.6%
#3
Improper Privilege Management
The software does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
929
 
5.4%
#4
Information Disclosure
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
810
 
4.7%
#5
Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
799
 
4.7%
#6
Out-of-bounds Read
The software reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. Typically, this can allow attackers to read sensitive information from other memory locations or cause a crash. A crash can occur when the code reads a variable amount of data and assumes that a sentinel exists to stop the read operation, such as a NUL in a string. The expected sentinel might not be located in the out-of-bounds memory, causing excessive data to be read, leading to a segmentation fault or a buffer overflow. The software may modify an index or perform pointer arithmetic that references a memory location that is outside of the boundaries of the buffer. A subsequent read operation then produces undefined or unexpected results.
592
 
3.5%
#7
Shell injection
The software constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
444
 
2.6%
#8
Buffer Overflow
The software performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer.
427
 
2.5%
#9
SQL Injection
The software constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component.
417
 
2.4%
#10
Directory traversal
The software uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the software does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
375
 
2.2%
#11
Classic Buffer Overflow
The program copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow. A buffer overflow condition exists when a program attempts to put more data in a buffer than it can hold, or when a program attempts to put data in a memory area outside of the boundaries of a buffer. The simplest type of error, and the most common cause of buffer overflows, is the "classic" case in which the program copies the buffer without restricting how much is copied. Other variants exist, but the existence of a classic overflow strongly suggests that the programmer is not considering even the most basic of security protections.
351
 
2.1%
#12
Session Riding
The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. When a web server is designed to receive a request from a client without any mechanism for verifying that it was intentionally sent, then it might be possible for an attacker to trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server which will be treated as an authentic request. This can be done via a URL, image load, XMLHttpRequest, etc. and can result in exposure of data or unintended code execution.
344
 
2.0%
#13
Dangling pointer
Referencing memory after it has been freed can cause a program to crash, use unexpected values, or execute code.
322
 
1.9%
#14
authentification
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the software does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
315
 
1.8%
#15
Injection
The software constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. Software has certain assumptions about what constitutes data and control respectively. It is the lack of verification of these assumptions for user-controlled input that leads to injection problems. Injection problems encompass a wide variety of issues -- all mitigated in very different ways and usually attempted in order to alter the control flow of the process. For this reason, the most effective way to discuss these weaknesses is to note the distinct features which classify them as injection weaknesses. The most important issue to note is that all injection problems share one thing in common -- i.e., they allow for the injection of control plane data into the user-controlled data plane. This means that the execution of the process may be altered by sending code in through legitimate data channels, using no other mechanism. While buffer overflows, and many other flaws, involve the use of some further issue to gain execution, injection problems need only for the data to be parsed. The most classic instantiations of this category of weakness are SQL injection and format string vulnerabilities.
259
 
1.5%
#16
AuthZ
The software performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.
246
 
1.4%
#17
Incorrect Default Permissions
During installation, installed file permissions are set to allow anyone to modify those files.
228
 
1.3%
#18
Resource Exhaustion
The software does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources.
223
 
1.3%
#19
Insufficiently Protected Credentials
The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval.
217
 
1.3%
#20
AuthZ
The software does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
211
 
1.2%
#21
Unrestricted File Upload
The software allows the attacker to upload or transfer files of dangerous types that can be automatically processed within the product's environment.
204
 
1.2%
#22
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors. When a resource is given a permissions setting that provides access to a wider range of actors than required, it could lead to the exposure of sensitive information, or the modification of that resource by unintended parties. This is especially dangerous when the resource is related to program configuration, execution or sensitive user data.
175
 
1.0%
#23
Use of Hard-coded Credentials
The software contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data.
167
 
1.0%
#24
NULL Pointer Dereference
A NULL pointer dereference occurs when the application dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid, but is NULL, typically causing a crash or exit. NULL pointer dereference issues can occur through a number of flaws, including race conditions, and simple programming omissions.
165
 
1.0%
#25
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
The software does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
155
 
0.9%

By Category

Content Management

Joomla

31 vulnerabilities in 2020

MediaWiki

30 vulnerabilities in 2020

Adobe Experience Manager

24 vulnerabilities in 2020

Database

Oracle MySQL

139 vulnerabilities in 2020

Oracle Database Server

15 vulnerabilities in 2020

MariaDB

15 vulnerabilities in 2020

Desktop Software

Apple iTunes

85 vulnerabilities in 2020

Mozilla Thunderbird

76 vulnerabilities in 2020

Microsoft Office

71 vulnerabilities in 2020

Development Tools

Oracle Java Development Kit (JDK)

41 vulnerabilities in 2020

Jenkins

18 vulnerabilities in 2020

Microsoft Visual Studio

10 vulnerabilities in 2020

DevOps

GitLab

235 vulnerabilities in 2020

Kubernetes

13 vulnerabilities in 2020

Docker

4 vulnerabilities in 2020

Email

Microsoft Exchange Server

14 vulnerabilities in 2020

Exim

1 vulnerability in 2020

Postfix

1 vulnerability in 2020

Front End Libraries

jQuery

4 vulnerabilities in 2020

Angular JS AngularJS

2 vulnerabilities in 2020

Java Application Servers

Oracle Weblogic Server

68 vulnerabilities in 2020

IBM WebSphere Application Server

22 vulnerabilities in 2020

Apache Tomcat

9 vulnerabilities in 2020

Java Libraries

FasterXML Jackson Databind

26 vulnerabilities in 2020

Libraries

Google Tensorflow

35 vulnerabilities in 2020

Microsoft ChakraCore

32 vulnerabilities in 2020

Microsoft .NET Core

5 vulnerabilities in 2020

Operating Systems

Debian Linux

1008 vulnerabilities in 2020

Microsoft Windows 10

801 vulnerabilities in 2020

Microsoft Windows Server 2016

789 vulnerabilities in 2020

Runtime Environments

Oracle Java Runtime Environment (JRE)

39 vulnerabilities in 2020

Oracle OpenJDK

20 vulnerabilities in 2020

nodejs node.js

14 vulnerabilities in 2020

Server Software

Microsoft Sharepoint Server

113 vulnerabilities in 2020

Microsoft Sharepoint Enterprise Server

106 vulnerabilities in 2020

OpenBSD OpenSSH

2 vulnerabilities in 2020

Virtualization

Oracle VM VirtualBox

69 vulnerabilities in 2020

QEMU

42 vulnerabilities in 2020

Citrix Xen Desktop

2 vulnerabilities in 2020

Web Application Framework

Django Project Django

6 vulnerabilities in 2020

Microsoft ASP.NET Core

5 vulnerabilities in 2020

Laravel

2 vulnerabilities in 2020

Web Applications

Apple iCloud

86 vulnerabilities in 2020

Web Browsers

Google Chrome

226 vulnerabilities in 2020

Mozilla Firefox

132 vulnerabilities in 2020

Web Servers

Apache HTTP Server

6 vulnerabilities in 2020

Caddy Server Caddy Web Server

1 vulnerability in 2020


Report Last Updated: September 23, 2023