Citrix Xen Citrix Xen Virtualization Software

Don't miss out!

Thousands of developers use stack.watch to stay informed.
Get an email whenever new security vulnerabilities are reported in any Citrix Xen product.

RSS Feeds for Citrix Xen security vulnerabilities

Create a CVE RSS feed including security vulnerabilities found in Citrix Xen products with stack.watch. Just hit watch, then grab your custom RSS feed url.

Products by Citrix Xen Sorted by Most Security Vulnerabilities since 2018

Citrix Xen Xen273 vulnerabilities

Citrix Xen Xapi8 vulnerabilities

By the Year

In 2026 there have been 47 vulnerabilities in Citrix Xen with an average score of 6.9 out of ten. Last year, in 2025 Citrix Xen had 9 security vulnerabilities published. That is, 38 more vulnerabilities have already been reported in 2026 as compared to last year. Last year, the average CVE base score was greater by 0.98




Year Vulnerabilities Average Score
2026 47 6.93
2025 9 7.91
2024 19 5.72
2023 14 6.75
2022 57 6.53
2021 27 6.96
2020 44 6.56
2019 25 0.00
2018 27 7.72

It may take a day or so for new Citrix Xen vulnerabilities to show up in the stats or in the list of recent security vulnerabilities. Additionally vulnerabilities may be tagged under a different product or component name.

Recent Citrix Xen Security Vulnerabilities

CVE Date Vulnerability Products
CVE-2026-79611 Oct 13, 2026
Xen Hypervisor VMX VMEntry Failure (CVE-2026-79611) For XSA-308 logic was introduced, as VMX VMEntry checks do not like the exact combination of state which occurs when #DB in intercepted, Single Stepping is active, and blocked by STI/MovSS is active, despite this being a legitimate state to be in. The resulting VMEntry failure is fatal to the guest. Sadly there is another special sub-case of the above, with branch tracing enabled. In that case the prior adjustment would still cause a VMentry failure, as before fatal to the guest.
Xen
CVE-2026-79610 Oct 13, 2026
Xen Hypervisor Grant Table Race Condition Causing Stale Pointers (XSA-501) XSA-501 was about issues with v1 -> v2 and v2 -> v1 changes racing certain other grant table operations. Sadly a v2 -> v1 -> v2 change has yet another effect which wasn't accounted for: During the first change, status pages would be freed. During the second change they would be allocated again. Hence across the full pair of change the addresses of the status pages may change, rendering stale previously calculated pointers into the status array.
Xen
CVE-2026-79609 Oct 13, 2026
Xen Hypervisor XPTI Page Table Isolation Flaw CVE-2026-79609 XPTI (Xen Page Table Isolation) was introduced to mitigate Meltdown (CVE-2017-5754, one aspect of XSA-254). This involves copying 64-bit PV guest page table entries from guest-chosen root page tables to the Xen- chosen one which is in actual use by hardware. To read the guest root page table, the directmap is used. PV guests, however, have a directmap which may not cover all memory; in particular this is the case if any memory extends beyond the 5 TiB (CONFIG_BIGMEM=y: 3.5 TiB) address boundary.
Xen
CVE-2026-79608 Oct 13, 2026
Xen Hypervisor - MSR Inverted Conditional Workaround Rework Failure The workaround for XSA-433 (Zenbleed, CVE-2023-20593) was later re-worked to better integrate with other manipulations of the same MSR. In this rework an inverted conditional was introduced, resulting in the workaround to not be applied when needed and vice versa. For more details, see: http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-433.html
Xen
CVE-2026-79607 Oct 13, 2026
Xenstore Watch State Record Byte Omission Crash During Xenstore live update the state record for a Xenstore watch with specified watch depth is written with two bytes missing. This results in an inconsistent state when reading the state back in the new Xenstore, causing a crash of Xenstore or wrong Xenstore data.
Xen
CVE-2026-79603 Sep 08, 2026
Xen Hypervisor TLB Flush Race Exposes PV Guest Memory Modification x86 PV guests can free memory pages while still keeping a stale TLB entry pointing to them. A TLB flush is only issued by Xen (if needed) when the page is re-used. Since it's possible for the page to be scrubbed ahead of the TLB flush, there's a window where a PV guest can modify an already scrubbed page.
Xen
CVE-2026-79602 Sep 08, 2026
Xen Hypervisor PCI BAR I/O Port BUG Trigger Vulnerability A guest with a PCI device assigned that has at least a BAR on the IO port space can trigger a BUG() in Xen.
Xen
CVE-2026-62437 Sep 08, 2026
Xen Hypervisor Guest Termination IRQ Tracking Race When guests are terminated, various pieces of cleanup need carrying out. The cleaning up of PCI devices which were assigned to guests, and the associated removal of tracking structures for IRQs used by the devices occurs relatively early in the process. Unfortunately after that point the guest about to be terminated could cause its device model (DM) to re-establish such tracking structures, by having it bind one or more IRQs anew. While some of those tracking structures would still be cleaned up later on, at least one would not be.
Xen
CVE-2026-62434 Jul 28, 2026
Xen PoD Guest Reclaimer Causes Memory Management Corruption A guest started with Populated on Demand enabled (PoD) can attempt to reclaim pages which aren't regular guest RAM. This can cause corruption of memory management state in Xen.
Xen
CVE-2026-62433 Jul 28, 2026
Xen Hypervisor Unchecked Buffer Count in DM_OP leads to stack corruption Parts of the DM_OP handling code assumes the caller has provided the required number of buffers for the given operation without any checking being done. As a result, certain operations might access stack rubble as structures are possibly uninitialized.
Xen
Built by Foundeo Inc., with data from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Privacy Policy. Use of this site is governed by the Legal Terms
Disclaimer
CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND DOES NOT IMPLY ANY KIND OF GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION ON THE DOCUMENT OR MATERIALS LINKED FROM THE DOCUMENT IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. Always check with your vendor for the most up to date, and accurate information.