Siemens
Don't miss out!
Thousands of developers use stack.watch to stay informed.Get an email whenever new security vulnerabilities are reported in any Siemens product.
RSS Feeds for Siemens security vulnerabilities
Create a CVE RSS feed including security vulnerabilities found in Siemens products with stack.watch. Just hit watch, then grab your custom RSS feed url.
Products by Siemens Sorted by Most Security Vulnerabilities since 2018
Known Exploited Siemens Vulnerabilities
The following Siemens vulnerabilities have been marked by CISA as Known to be Exploited by threat actors.
| Title | Description | Added |
|---|---|---|
| Siemens SIMATIC CP 1543-1 Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability |
An improper privilege management vulnerability exists within the Siemens SIMATIC Communication Processor (CP) that allows a privileged attacker to remotely cause a denial of service. CVE-2016-8562 Exploit Probability: 18.5% |
March 3, 2022 |
The vulnerability CVE-2016-8562: Siemens SIMATIC CP 1543-1 Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability is in the top 5% of the currently known exploitable vulnerabilities.
By the Year
In 2026 there have been 66 vulnerabilities in Siemens with an average score of 7.1 out of ten. Last year, in 2025 Siemens had 199 security vulnerabilities published. Right now, Siemens is on track to have less security vulnerabilities in 2026 than it did last year. Last year, the average CVE base score was greater by 0.30
| Year | Vulnerabilities | Average Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 66 | 7.15 |
| 2025 | 199 | 7.44 |
| 2024 | 236 | 7.26 |
| 2023 | 207 | 7.52 |
| 2022 | 241 | 7.43 |
| 2021 | 318 | 7.16 |
| 2020 | 78 | 6.55 |
| 2019 | 135 | 7.46 |
| 2018 | 29 | 7.47 |
It may take a day or so for new Siemens vulnerabilities to show up in the stats or in the list of recent security vulnerabilities. Additionally vulnerabilities may be tagged under a different product or component name.
Recent Siemens Security Vulnerabilities
| CVE | Date | Vulnerability | Products |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-42177 | May 12, 2026 |
Entra SSO Plug Prior 1.8.1: Chrome PRT Cookie Injection via Host Permissionslinux-entra-sso is a browser plugin for Linux to SSO on Microsoft Entra ID. Prior to 1.8.1, platform/chrome/js/platform-chrome.js:69-88 registers a single declarativeNetRequest rule whose urlFilter is Platform.SSO_URL + "/*", i.e. "https://login.microsoftonline.com/*". Chrome's urlFilter without a | or || anchor is substring-matched against the full request URL. The same applied rule action is modifyHeaders that attaches the Entra ID Primary Refresh Token cookie. The Firefox adapter in platform/firefox/js/platform-firefox.js:53 performs a belt-and-braces startsWith(Platform.SSO_URL) check before injecting the header; the Chrome adapter does not. When the extension holds broad host permissions through the optional_host_permissions: ["https://*/*"] declared in platform/chrome/manifest.json:34, a main-frame navigation to a URL whose path embeds https://login.microsoftonline.com/ causes Chrome to attach the PRT cookie to the request to the attacker-controlled host. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1. |
|
| CVE-2025-12659 | May 12, 2026 |
ICS IPT Parser Memory Corruption Allows Code ExecutionThe affected applications contains a memory corruption vulnerability while parsing specially crafted IPT files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-27349, ZDI-CAN-27389) |
Simcenter Femap
|
| CVE-2026-44412 | May 12, 2026 |
Solid Edge SE2026 V226.0 Update5: Stack Buffer Overflow in PAR ParserA vulnerability has been identified in Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 5). The affected applications contain a stack based overflow vulnerability while parsing specially crafted PAR files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. |
Solid Edge
|
| CVE-2026-44411 | May 12, 2026 |
Uninitialized Pointer in Solid Edge SE2026 <=226.0 Update5 PAR ParsingA vulnerability has been identified in Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 5). The affected application is vulnerable to uninitialized pointer access while parsing specially crafted PAR files. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. |
Solid Edge
|
| CVE-2026-41551 | May 12, 2026 |
Remote Path Traversal in ROS# <V2.2.2 (All versions)A vulnerability has been identified in ROS# (All versions < V2.2.2). Affected versions contain a path traversal vulnerability because user input is not properly sanitized. This could allow a remote attacker to access arbitrary files on the device. |
|
| CVE-2026-41125 | May 12, 2026 |
KACO Meteor SQLi Elevation via Unneutralized Params (All Blueplanet Series)A vulnerability has been identified in blueplanet 100 NX3 M8 (All versions), blueplanet 100 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 105 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 105 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 110 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 125 NX3 M11 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 137 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 150 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 150 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 155 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 155 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 165 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 165 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 25.0 NX3-33.0 NX3 (All versions), blueplanet 3.0 NX3-20.0 NX3 (All versions), blueplanet 3.0-5.0 NX1 (All versions), blueplanet 360 NX3 M6 (All versions), blueplanet 50.0 NX3-60.0 NX3 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet gridsafe 110 TL3-S (All versions), blueplanet gridsafe 137 TL3-S (All versions), blueplanet gridsafe 92.0 TL3-S (All versions), blueplanet hybrid 10.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet hybrid 6.0 NH3-12.0 NH3 (All versions). Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in KACO Meteor server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a local network. |
|
| CVE-2026-33893 | May 12, 2026 |
Teamcenter Hardcoded Keys in obfuscation (V2312-2512)A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter V2312 (All versions < V2312.0014), Teamcenter V2406 (All versions < V2406.0012), Teamcenter V2412 (All versions < V2412.0009), Teamcenter V2506 (All versions < V2506.0005), Teamcenter V2512 (All versions). The affected application contains hardcoded key which is used for obfuscation stored directly into the application. This could allow an attacker to obtain these keys and misuse them to gain unauthorized access. |
|
| CVE-2026-33862 | May 12, 2026 |
XSS in Siemens Teamcenter v<2312.0014/2406.0012/2412.0009/2506.0005/2512A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter V2312 (All versions < V2312.0014), Teamcenter V2406 (All versions < V2406.0012), Teamcenter V2412 (All versions < V2412.0009), Teamcenter V2506 (All versions < V2506.0005), Teamcenter V2512 (All versions). The affected application does not properly encode or filter user-supplied data. This could allow an attacker to inject malicious code that can be executed by other users when they visit the affected page. |
|
| CVE-2026-27662 | May 12, 2026 |
Siemens Control Panel Browser Access Bypass (CVE-2026-27662)Affected devices do not properly restrict access to the web browser via the Control Panel when no corresponding security mechanisms are in place. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to the web browser, potentially enabling the discovery of backdoors, performing unauthorized actions, or exploiting misconfigurations that may lead to further system compromise. |
|
| CVE-2026-25789 | May 12, 2026 |
Remote XSS via Firmware Update Filename Validation on Siemens DeviceAffected devices do not properly validate and sanitize filenames on the Firmware Update page. This could allow a remote attacker to social engineer the user into selecting the modified firmware file to be uploaded. This would result in malitcious JavaScript execution in the context of the authenticated user's session without requiring the file to be uploaded, potentially leading to session hijacking or credential theft. |
Simatic S7 1500 Software Controller
Simatic S7 Plcsim Advanced
|
| CVE-2026-25787 | May 12, 2026 |
Siemens XSS in Motion Control Diagnostics via unsanitized TO namesAffected devices do not properly validate and sanitize Technology Object (TO) name rendered on the "Motion Control Diagnostics" page of the web interface. This could allow an authenticated attacker who is authorized to download a TIA project into the product, to inject malicious scripts into the page. If a benign user with appropriate rights accesses the "Motion Control Diagnostics" parameters page, the malicious code would be executed in the scope of their web session. |
Simatic S7 1500 Software Controller
Simatic S7 Plcsim Advanced
|
| CVE-2026-25786 | May 12, 2026 |
Siemens PLC XSS: Unvalidated PLC/Station Names in Web InterfaceAffected devices do not properly validate and sanitize PLC/station name rendered on the "communication" parameters page of the web interface. This could allow an authenticated attacker who is authorized to download a TIA project into the product, to inject malicious scripts into the page. If a benign user with appropriate rights accesses the "communication" parameters page, the malicious code would be executed in the scope of their web session. |
Simatic S7 1500 Software Controller
Simatic S7 Plcsim Advanced
|
| CVE-2026-22925 | May 12, 2026 |
SIMATIC CN4100 <V5.0 Resource Exhaustion via SYN Flood (DOS)A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CN 4100 (All versions < V5.0). The affected application is susceptible to resource exhaustion when subjected to high volume of TCP SYN packets This could allow an attacker to render the service unavailable and cause denial-of-service conditions by overwhelming system resources. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2026-22924 | May 12, 2026 |
SIMATIC CN4100 <V5.0: Unauth Conn Flaw Leads to Res ExhaustionA vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CN 4100 (All versions < V5.0). The affected application does not properly restrict unauthenticated connections and is susceptible to resource exhaustion conditions. This could allow an attacker to disrupt normal operations or perform unauthorized actions, potentially impacting system availability and integrity. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2025-40949 | May 12, 2026 |
Cmd Inject via Scheduler in RuggedCom ROX <V2.17.1A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1). Affected devices do not properly sanitize user-supplied input in the Scheduler functionality of the Web UI, allowing commands to be injected into the task scheduling backend. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system. |
|
| CVE-2025-40948 | May 12, 2026 |
RUGGEDCOM ROX JSONRPC input validation flaw allows root file read < V2.17.1A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1). Affected devices do not properly validate input in the web server's JSON-RPC interface. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to read arbitrary files from the underlying operating system's filesystem with root privileges. |
|
| CVE-2025-40947 | May 12, 2026 |
RUGGEDCOM ROX Series RCE via unsanitized Feature Key Install (<V2.17.1)A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1). Affected devices do not properly sanitize user-supplied input during the feature key installation process. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary commands, resulting in remote code execution with root privileges on the underlying operating system. |
|
| CVE-2025-40946 | May 12, 2026 |
BluePlanet CRC16 Credentials Derivation Vulnerability (v6.1.4.9)A vulnerability has been identified in blueplanet 100 NX3 M8 (All versions), blueplanet 100 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 105 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 105 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 110 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 125 NX3 M11 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 137 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 150 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 150 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 155 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 155 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 165 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 165 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 25.0 NX3-33.0 NX3 (All versions), blueplanet 3.0 NX3-20.0 NX3 (All versions), blueplanet 3.0 TL3-60.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 3.0-5.0 NX1 (All versions), blueplanet 360 NX3 M6 (All versions), blueplanet 50.0 NX3-60.0 NX3 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet gridsafe 110 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet gridsafe 137 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet gridsafe 92.0 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet hybrid 10.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet hybrid 6.0 NH3-12.0 NH3 (All versions). A CRC16-based algorithm for generating Technical Service credentials could allow an attacker to derive the credentials from the devices serial number and misuse them to gain unauthorized access. |
|
| CVE-2025-40833 | May 12, 2026 |
SIEMENS Device Null Pointer Dereference in IPv4 Request ParsingThe affected devices contain a null pointer dereference vulnerability while processing specially crafted IPv4 requests. This could allow an attacker to cause denial of service condition. A manual restart is required to recover the system. |
Sinumerik 840d Sl
|
| CVE-2024-54017 | May 12, 2026 |
Unauth Remote Session ID Brute Force Siemens SIPROTEC 5 (V<11.0)A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V11.0). Affected devices do not use sufficiently random values to create session identifiers. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to brute force a session identifier and gain read access to limited information from the web server without authorization. |
|
| CVE-2026-33892 | Apr 14, 2026 |
Industrial Edge Mgmt IEM Auth Bypass (V1.7.6-1.15.16, V2-2.1, V2.2-2.8)A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge Management Pro V1 (All versions >= V1.7.6 < V1.15.17), Industrial Edge Management Pro V2 (All versions >= V2.0.0 < V2.1.1), Industrial Edge Management Virtual (All versions >= V2.2.0 < V2.8.0). Affected management systems do not properly enforce user authentication on remote connections to devices. This could facilitate an unauthenticated remote attacker to circumvent authentication and impersonate a legitimate user. Successful exploitation requires that the attacker has identified the header and port used for remote connections to devices and that the remote connection feature is enabled for the device. Exploitation allows the attacker to tunnel to the device. Security features on this device itself (e.g. app specific authentication) are not affected. |
|
| CVE-2026-27668 | Apr 14, 2026 |
Auth Admin Priv Escalation in RuggedCOM CROSSBOW SAM-P <5.8A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW Secure Access Manager Primary (SAM-P) (All versions < V5.8). User Administrators are allowed to administer groups they belong to. This could allow an authenticated User Administrator to escalate their own privileges and grant themselves access to any device group at any access level. |
Ruggedcom Crossbow
|
| CVE-2026-25654 | Apr 14, 2026 |
SINEC NMS < V4.0 SP3 Auth Bypass in Password ResetA vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP3). Affected products do not properly validate user authorization when processing password reset requests. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to bypass authorization checks, leading to the ability to reset the password of any arbitrary user account. |
Sinec Nms
|
| CVE-2026-24032 | Apr 14, 2026 |
Authentication Bypass in SINEC NMS <4.0 SP3 UMC ComponentA vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP3 with UMC). The affected application contains an authentication weakness due to insufficient validation of user identity in the UMC component. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to the application. (ZDI-CAN-27564) |
Sinec Nms
|
| CVE-2025-40745 | Apr 14, 2026 |
Siemens Simcenter MITM via unvalidated client certs (preV3.5.8.2...)A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens Software Center (All versions < V3.5.8.2), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002), Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (All versions < V2602), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions < V225.0 Update 13), Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 04), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation (All versions < V2504.0008). Affected applications do not properly validate client certificates to connect to Analytics Service endpoint. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform man in the middle attacks. |
Simcenter Femap
Solid Edge
Tecnomatix Plant Simulation
And others... |
| CVE-2026-40175 | Apr 10, 2026 |
Axios <1.15.0 Prototype Pollution RCE via Gadget AttackAxios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.0 and 0.3.1, the Axios library is vulnerable to a specific "Gadget" attack chain that allows Prototype Pollution in any third-party dependency to be escalated into Remote Code Execution (RCE) or Full Cloud Compromise (via AWS IMDSv2 bypass). This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.0 and 0.3.1. |
|
| CVE-2026-31790 | Apr 07, 2026 |
OpenSSL 3.6+ RSA KEM Buffer Leak via EVP_PKEY_encapsulateIssue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to a malicious peer. Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might contain sensitive data from the previous execution of the application process which leads to sensitive data leakage to an attacker. RSA_public_encrypt() returns the number of bytes written on success and -1 on error. The affected code tests only whether the return value is non-zero. As a result, if RSA encryption fails, encapsulation can still return success to the caller, set the output lengths, and leave the caller to use the contents of the ciphertext buffer as if a valid KEM ciphertext had been produced. If applications use EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() with RSA/RSASVE on an attacker-supplied invalid RSA public key without first validating that key, then this may cause stale or uninitialized contents of the caller-provided ciphertext buffer to be disclosed to the attacker in place of the KEM ciphertext. As a workaround calling EVP_PKEY_public_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check_quick() before EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() will mitigate the issue. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2026-31789 | Apr 07, 2026 |
OpenSSL X.509 OCTET STRINGHeap overflow on 32-bitIssue summary: Converting an excessively large OCTET STRING value to a hexadecimal string leads to a heap buffer overflow on 32 bit platforms. Impact summary: A heap buffer overflow may lead to a crash or possibly an attacker controlled code execution or other undefined behavior. If an attacker can supply a crafted X.509 certificate with an excessively large OCTET STRING value in extensions such as the Subject Key Identifier (SKID) or Authority Key Identifier (AKID) which are being converted to hex, the size of the buffer needed for the result is calculated as multiplication of the input length by 3. On 32 bit platforms, this multiplication may overflow resulting in the allocation of a smaller buffer and a heap buffer overflow. Applications and services that print or log contents of untrusted X.509 certificates are vulnerable to this issue. As the certificates would have to have sizes of over 1 Gigabyte, printing or logging such certificates is a fairly unlikely operation and only 32 bit platforms are affected, this issue was assigned Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2026-28390 | Apr 07, 2026 |
OpenSSL CMS NULL Deref via KeyTransportRecipientInfo before 3.6Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen. Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service. When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing. Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2026-28389 | Apr 07, 2026 |
OpenSSL 3.x CMS NULL Deref via KeyAgreeRecipientInfo in EnvelopedDataIssue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen. Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service. When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing. Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2026-28388 | Apr 07, 2026 |
OpenSSL Delta CRL Indicator NPE CVE-2026-28388Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application. When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference. Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it. The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2026-28387 | Apr 07, 2026 |
OpenSSL DANE TLSA UAF VulnerabilityIssue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side. Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage. By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable. The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records. No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2026-27664 | Mar 26, 2026 |
OOB Write in Siemens CPCI85 SC XML Parser <V26.10 Causes DoSA vulnerability has been identified in CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication (All versions < V26.10), SICORE Base system (All versions < V26.10.0). The affected application contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XML inputs. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to exploit this issue by sending a malicious XML request, which may cause the service to crash, resulting in a denial-of-service condition. |
|
| CVE-2026-27663 | Mar 26, 2026 |
DoS via Resource Exhaustion in Siemens CPCI85/RTUM85 <26.10A vulnerability has been identified in CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication (All versions < V26.10), RTUM85 RTU Base (All versions < V26.10). The affected application contains denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability. The remote operation mode is susceptible to a resource exhaustion condition when subjected to a high volume of requests. Sending multiple requests can exhaust resources, preventing parameterization and requiring a reset or reboot to restore functionality. |
|
| CVE-2026-2673 | Mar 13, 2026 |
OpenSSL 3.5/3.6 TLS 1.3 Preferred KEX Tuple Bug (CVE-2026-2673)Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue. |
Simatic Cn 4100
|
| CVE-2026-27661 | Mar 10, 2026 |
SINEC SSM Server <V4.9.0 Private Data Leakage in MetadataA vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.9.0). The affected application leaks confidential information in metadata, and files such as information on contributors and email address, on `SSM Server`. |
Sinec Security Monitor
|
| CVE-2026-25605 | Mar 10, 2026 |
Siemens SICAM SIAPP SDK <V2.1.7 Path Traversal Deletion VulnerabilityA vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The affected application performs file deletion without properly validating the file path or target. An attacker could delete files or sockets that the affected process has permission to remove, potentially resulting in denial of service or service disruption. |
|
| CVE-2026-25573 | Mar 10, 2026 |
SICAM SIAPP SDK cmd injection <V2.1.7: full system compromiseA vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The affected application builds shell commands with caller-provided strings and executes them. An attacker could influence the executed command, potentially resulting in command injection and full system compromise. |
|
| CVE-2026-25572 | Mar 10, 2026 |
SICAM SIAPP SDK V<2.1.7 Server Stack Overflow via Oversized Input (DOS)A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK server component does not enforce maximum length checks on certain variables before use. This could allow an attacker to send an oversized input that could trigger a stack overflow crashing the process and potentially causing denial of service. |
|
| CVE-2026-25571 | Mar 10, 2026 |
SIAPP SDK <V2.1.7: SO vulnerability (stack overflow), DOSA vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK client component does not enforce maximum length checks on certain variables before use. This could allow an attacker to send an oversized input that could trigger a stack overflow crashing the process and potentially causing denial of service. |
|
| CVE-2026-25570 | Mar 10, 2026 |
Stack Overfl in SICAM SIAPP SDK <2.1.7 enabling EoCA vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). The SICAM SIAPP SDK does not perform checks on input values potentially resulting in stack overflow. This could allow an attacker to perform code execution and denial of service. |
|
| CVE-2026-25569 | Mar 10, 2026 |
SICAM SIAPP SDK OOB Write (preV2.1.7) for Arbitrary Code ExecutionA vulnerability has been identified in SICAM SIAPP SDK (All versions < V2.1.7). An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in SICAM SIAPP SDK. This could allow an attacker to write data beyond the intended buffer, potentially leading to denial of service, or arbitrary code execution. |
|
| CVE-2025-40943 | Mar 10, 2026 |
CVE-2025-40943: Siemens Devices allow Code Injection via Malformed Trace FilesAffected devices do not properly sanitize contents of trace files. This could allow an attacker to inject code through social engineering an authorized user, who has the function right "Read diagnostics", to import a specially crafted trace file. The malicious trace file is insufficiently sanitized and malicious code could be executed in the clients browser session and trigger PLC operations via the webserver that the legitimate user is authorized to perform. |
Simatic S7 1500 Software Controller
Simatic S7 Plcsim Advanced
|
| CVE-2025-27769 | Mar 10, 2026 |
Heliox EV Charging Stn: Improper ACL via Cable (Pre-F4.11.1/L4.10.1)A vulnerability has been identified in Heliox Flex 180 kW EV Charging Station (All versions < F4.11.1), Heliox Mobile DC 40 kW EV Charging Station (All versions < L4.10.1). Affected devices contain improper access control that could allow an attacker to reach unauthorized services via the charging cable. |
|
| CVE-2026-27446 | Mar 04, 2026 |
CVE-2026-27446: Missing Auth on Core Protocol in Apache Artemis 2.50.0-2.51.0Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CWE-306) vulnerability in Apache Artemis, Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use the Core protocol to force a target broker to establish an outbound Core federation connection to an attacker-controlled rogue broker. This could potentially result in message injection into any queue and/or message exfiltration from any queue via the rogue broker. This impacts environments that allow both: - incoming Core protocol connections from untrusted sources to the broker - outgoing Core protocol connections from the broker to untrusted targets This issue affects: - Apache Artemis from 2.50.0 through 2.51.0 - Apache ActiveMQ Artemis from 2.11.0 through 2.44.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Artemis version 2.52.0, which fixes the issue. The issue can be mitigated by one of the following: - Remove Core protocol support from any acceptor receiving connections from untrusted sources. Incoming Core protocol connections are supported by default via the "artemis" acceptor listening on port 61616. See the "protocols" URL parameter configured for the acceptor. An acceptor URL without this parameter supports all protocols by default, including Core. - Use two-way SSL (i.e. certificate-based authentication) in order to force every client to present the proper SSL certificate when establishing a connection before any message protocol handshake is attempted. This will prevent unauthenticated exploitation of this vulnerability. - Implement and deploy a Core interceptor to deny all Core downstream federation connect packets. Such packets have a type of (int) -16 or (byte) 0xfffffff0. Documentation for interceptors is available at https://artemis.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/intercepting-operations.html . |
|
| CVE-2026-25656 | Feb 10, 2026 |
SINEC NMS UMC <V2.15.2.1 Config Mod Allow DLL Exec (SYSTEM)A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP3), User Management Component (UMC) (All versions < V2.15.2.1). The affected application permits improper modification of a configuration file by a low-privileged user. This could allow an attacker to load malicious DLLs, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges.(ZDI-CAN-28108) |
Sinec Nms
|
| CVE-2026-25655 | Feb 10, 2026 |
SINEC NMS < V4.0 SP2: Config File Alteration Allows DLL-Aided Code ExecA vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP2). The affected application permits improper modification of a configuration file by a low-privileged user. This could allow an attacker to load malicious DLLs, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with administrative privilege.(ZDI-CAN-28107) |
Sinec Nms
|
| CVE-2026-23720 | Feb 10, 2026 |
OOB Read in Simcenter Femap/Nastran NDB Parser Enables Code ExecA vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted NDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. |
Simcenter Femap
|
| CVE-2026-23719 | Feb 10, 2026 |
Heap Bf Overflow in Simcenter Femap/Nastran NDB Parser (CVE-2026-23719)A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected application is vulnerable to heap-based buffer overflow while parsing specially crafted NDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. |
Simcenter Femap
|
| CVE-2026-23718 | Feb 10, 2026 |
Simcenter Femap/Nastran OOB Read in NDB Parsing Enables Code ExecutionA vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted NDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. |
Simcenter Femap
|