Synology Dns Server
Don't miss out!
Thousands of developers use stack.watch to stay informed.Get an email whenever new security vulnerabilities are reported in Synology Dns Server.
By the Year
In 2025 there have been 0 vulnerabilities in Synology Dns Server. Dns Server did not have any published security vulnerabilities last year.
Year | Vulnerabilities | Average Score |
---|---|---|
2025 | 0 | 0.00 |
2024 | 0 | 0.00 |
2023 | 0 | 0.00 |
2022 | 1 | 8.10 |
2021 | 0 | 0.00 |
2020 | 3 | 7.17 |
2019 | 0 | 0.00 |
2018 | 0 | 0.00 |
It may take a day or so for new Dns Server vulnerabilities to show up in the stats or in the list of recent security vulnerabilties. Additionally vulnerabilities may be tagged under a different product or component name.
Recent Synology Dns Server Security Vulnerabilities
Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in cgi component in Synology DNS Server before 2.2.2-5027
CVE-2022-27615
8.1 - High
- July 28, 2022
Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in cgi component in Synology DNS Server before 2.2.2-5027 allows remote authenticated users to delete arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Directory traversal
In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker on the network path for a TSIG-signed request, or operating the server receiving the TSIG-signed request, could send a truncated response to
CVE-2020-8622
6.5 - Medium
- August 21, 2020
In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker on the network path for a TSIG-signed request, or operating the server receiving the TSIG-signed request, could send a truncated response to that request, triggering an assertion failure, causing the server to exit. Alternately, an off-path attacker would have to correctly guess when a TSIG-signed request was sent, along with other characteristics of the packet and message, and spoof a truncated response to trigger an assertion failure, causing the server to exit.
assertion failure
In BIND 9.10.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.10.5-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker
CVE-2020-8623
7.5 - High
- August 21, 2020
In BIND 9.10.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.10.5-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker that can reach a vulnerable system with a specially crafted query packet can trigger a crash. To be vulnerable, the system must: * be running BIND that was built with "--enable-native-pkcs11" * be signing one or more zones with an RSA key * be able to receive queries from a possible attacker
assertion failure
In BIND 9.14.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, If a server is configured with both QNAME minimization and 'forward first' then an attacker who can send queries to it may be able to trigger the condition
CVE-2020-8621
7.5 - High
- August 21, 2020
In BIND 9.14.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, If a server is configured with both QNAME minimization and 'forward first' then an attacker who can send queries to it may be able to trigger the condition that will cause the server to crash. Servers that 'forward only' are not affected.
assertion failure
Stay on top of Security Vulnerabilities
Want an email whenever new vulnerabilities are published for NetApp Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage or by Synology? Click the Watch button to subscribe.