Mitel Micollab
By the Year
In 2022 there have been 0 vulnerabilities in Mitel Micollab . Last year Micollab had 9 security vulnerabilities published. Right now, Micollab is on track to have less security vulnerabilities in 2022 than it did last year.
| Year | Vulnerabilities | Average Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 2021 | 9 | 6.49 |
| 2020 | 8 | 5.90 |
| 2019 | 2 | 7.55 |
| 2018 | 1 | 5.50 |
It may take a day or so for new Micollab vulnerabilities to show up in the stats or in the list of recent security vulnerabilties. Additionally vulnerabilities may be tagged under a different product or component name.
Recent Mitel Micollab Security Vulnerabilities
The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could
CVE-2021-32072
6.5 - Medium
- August 13, 2021
The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to get source code information (disclosing sensitive application data) due to insufficient output sanitization. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view source code methods.
Output Sanitization
The Join Meeting page of Mitel MiCollab Web Client before 9.2 FP2 could
CVE-2021-27401
6.1 - Medium
- August 13, 2021
The Join Meeting page of Mitel MiCollab Web Client before 9.2 FP2 could allow an attacker to access (view and modify) user data by executing arbitrary code due to insufficient input validation, aka Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).
XSS
The SAS Admin portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 FP2 could
CVE-2021-27402
6.5 - Medium
- August 13, 2021
The SAS Admin portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 FP2 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to access (view and modify) user data by injecting arbitrary directory paths due to improper URL validation, aka Directory Traversal.
Directory traversal
The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could
CVE-2021-32067
6.5 - Medium
- August 13, 2021
The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to view sensitive system information through an HTTP response due to insufficient output sanitization.
Output Sanitization
The AWV and MiCollab Client Service components in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could
CVE-2021-32068
3.7 - Low
- August 13, 2021
The AWV and MiCollab Client Service components in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a Man-In-the-Middle attack by sending multiple session renegotiation requests, due to insufficient TLS session controls. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to modify application data and state.
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could
CVE-2021-32069
4.8 - Medium
- August 13, 2021
The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a Man-In-the-Middle attack due to improper TLS negotiation. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify data.
Improper Certificate Validation
The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could
CVE-2021-32070
5.4 - Medium
- August 13, 2021
The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a clickjacking attack due to an insecure header response. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to modify the browser header and redirect users.
Clickjacking
The MiCollab Client service in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could
CVE-2021-32071
9.8 - Critical
- August 13, 2021
The MiCollab Client service in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an unauthenticated user to gain system access due to improper access control. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify application data, and cause a denial of service for users.
authentification
A library index page in NuPoint Messenger in Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 FP1 could
CVE-2020-35547
9.1 - Critical
- January 29, 2021
A library index page in NuPoint Messenger in Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 FP1 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain access (view and modify) to user data.
AuthZ
The NuPoint Messenger of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could
CVE-2020-25612
4.9 - Medium
- December 18, 2020
The NuPoint Messenger of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker with escalated privilege to access user files due to insufficient access control. Successful exploit could potentially allow an attacker to gain access to sensitive information.
AuthZ
The online help portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could
CVE-2020-27340
6.1 - Medium
- December 18, 2020
The online help portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to redirect a user to an unauthorized website by executing malicious script due to insufficient access control.
Open Redirect
The AWV portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could
CVE-2020-25611
6.1 - Medium
- December 18, 2020
The AWV portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to gain access to conference information by sending arbitrary code due to improper input validation, aka XSS. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to view user conference information.
XSS
The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could
CVE-2020-25610
5.3 - Medium
- December 18, 2020
The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to gain access to a web conference due to insufficient access control for conference codes.
AuthZ
The NuPoint Messenger Portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could
CVE-2020-25609
5.4 - Medium
- December 18, 2020
The NuPoint Messenger Portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to insufficient input validation, aka XSS. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify user data.
XSS
The SAS portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could
CVE-2020-25608
7.2 - High
- December 18, 2020
The SAS portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to access user credentials due to improper input validation, aka SQL Injection.
SQL Injection
The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could
CVE-2020-25606
6.1 - Medium
- December 18, 2020
The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to view system information by sending arbitrary code due to improper input validation, aka XSS.
XSS
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web conferencing component of the Mitel MiCollab application before 9.0.15 for Android could
CVE-2019-19370
6.1 - Medium
- March 02, 2020
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web conferencing component of the Mitel MiCollab application before 9.0.15 for Android could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation in the file upload interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts.
XSS
A vulnerability in the web conference chat component of MiCollab, versions 7.3 PR6 (7.3.0.601) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP2 (8.0.2.202), and MiVoice Business Express versions 7.3 PR3 (7.3.1.302) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP1 (8.0.2.202), could
CVE-2018-18819
5.3 - Medium
- November 12, 2019
A vulnerability in the web conference chat component of MiCollab, versions 7.3 PR6 (7.3.0.601) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP2 (8.0.2.202), and MiVoice Business Express versions 7.3 PR3 (7.3.1.302) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP1 (8.0.2.202), could allow creation of unauthorized chat sessions, due to insufficient access controls. A successful exploit could allow execution of arbitrary commands.
AuthZ
MiCollab 7.3 PR2 (7.3.0.204) and earlier
CVE-2019-12165
9.8 - Critical
- May 29, 2019
MiCollab 7.3 PR2 (7.3.0.204) and earlier, 7.2 (7.2.2.13) and earlier, and 7.1 (7.1.0.57) and earlier and MiCollab AWV 6.3 (6.3.0.103), 6.2 (6.2.2.8), 6.1 (6.1.0.28), 6.0 (6.0.0.61), and 5.0 (5.0.5.7) have a Command Execution Vulnerability. Successful exploit of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary system commands.
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may
CVE-2018-3639
5.5 - Medium
- May 22, 2018
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4.
Side Channel Attack
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets
CVE-2014-0160
7.5 - High
- April 07, 2014
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug.CVSS V2 scoring evaluates the impact of the vulnerability on the host where the vulnerability is located. When evaluating the impact of this vulnerability to your organization, take into account the nature of the data that is being protected and act according to your organizations risk acceptance. While CVE-2014-0160 does not allow unrestricted access to memory on the targeted host, a successful exploit does leak information from memory locations which have the potential to contain particularly sensitive information, e.g., cryptographic keys and passwords. Theft of this information could enable other attacks on the information system, the impact of which would depend on the sensitivity of the data and functions of that system.
Buffer Overflow
Stay on top of Security Vulnerabilities
Want an email whenever new vulnerabilities are published for Red Hat Virtualization or by Mitel? Click the Watch button to subscribe.
