Red Hat Openshift Gitops
Don't miss out!
Thousands of developers use stack.watch to stay informed.Get an email whenever new security vulnerabilities are reported in Red Hat Openshift Gitops.
Recent Red Hat Openshift Gitops Security Advisories
| Advisory | Title | Published |
|---|---|---|
| RHSA-2026:1488 | (RHSA-2026:1488) Important: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.19.1 security update | January 28, 2026 |
| RHSA-2026:1018 | (RHSA-2026:1018) Important: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.17.4 security update **Post-Upgrade Action Required: Audit GitOps Operator Roles** Following this upgrade, we strongly recommend you run the provided audit script to review namespace-scoped | January 22, 2026 |
| RHSA-2026:1017 | (RHSA-2026:1017) Important: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.18.3 security update | January 22, 2026 |
| RHSA-2025:23207 | (RHSA-2025:23207) Important: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.16.5 security update | December 15, 2025 |
| RHSA-2025:23206 | (RHSA-2025:23206) Important: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.17.3 security update **Post-Upgrade Action Required: Audit GitOps Operator Roles** Following this upgrade, we strongly recommend you run the provided audit script to review namespace-scoped | December 15, 2025 |
| RHSA-2025:23203 | (RHSA-2025:23203) Important: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.18.2 security update | December 15, 2025 |
| RHSA-2025:8278 | (RHSA-2025:8278) Important: Errata Advisory for Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.16.1 security update | May 28, 2025 |
| RHSA-2025:8277 | (RHSA-2025:8277) Important: Errata Advisory for Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.15.3 security update | May 28, 2025 |
| RHSA-2025:8274 | (RHSA-2025:8274) Important: Errata Advisory for Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.14.4 security update | May 28, 2025 |
| RHSA-2025:8269 | (RHSA-2025:8269) Important: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.16.1 security release | May 28, 2025 |
By the Year
In 2026 there have been 1 vulnerability in Red Hat Openshift Gitops with an average score of 5.3 out of ten. Last year, in 2025 Openshift Gitops had 3 security vulnerabilities published. If vulnerabilities keep coming in at the current rate, it appears that number of security vulnerabilities in Openshift Gitops in 2026 could surpass last years number. Last year, the average CVE base score was greater by 1.70
| Year | Vulnerabilities | Average Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1 | 5.30 |
| 2025 | 3 | 7.00 |
| 2024 | 4 | 6.10 |
| 2023 | 2 | 6.70 |
| 2022 | 1 | 6.50 |
It may take a day or so for new Openshift Gitops vulnerabilities to show up in the stats or in the list of recent security vulnerabilities. Additionally vulnerabilities may be tagged under a different product or component name.
Recent Red Hat Openshift Gitops Security Vulnerabilities
Information Disclosure in Go Viper Mapstructure WeakDecode via Error Messages
CVE-2025-11065
5.3 - Medium
- January 26, 2026
A flaw was found in github.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2, in the field processing component using mapstructure.WeakDecode. This vulnerability allows information disclosure through detailed error messages that may leak sensitive input values via malformed user-supplied data processed in security-critical contexts.
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
OpenShift GitOps Escalation via ArgoCD CR Manipulation
CVE-2025-13888
9.1 - Critical
- December 15, 2025
A flaw was found in OpenShift GitOps. Namespace admins can create ArgoCD Custom Resources (CRs) that trick the system into granting them elevated permissions in other namespaces, including privileged namespaces. An authenticated attacker can then use these elevated permissions to create privileged workloads that run on master nodes, effectively giving them root access to the entire cluster.
Incorrect Privilege Assignment
CIRCL FourQ RCE via Low-Order Point Injection in Diffie-Hellman
CVE-2025-8556
3.7 - Low
- August 06, 2025
A flaw was found in CIRCL's implementation of the FourQ elliptic curve. This vulnerability allows an attacker to compromise session security via low-order point injection and incorrect point validation during Diffie-Hellman key exchange.
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
OpenShift GitOps Operator Permissive Label Enables ClusterWide Rogue PromRules
CVE-2024-13484
8.2 - High
- January 28, 2025
A flaw was found in openshift-gitops-operator-container. The openshift.io/cluster-monitoring label is applied to all namespaces that deploy an ArgoCD CR instance, allowing the namespace to create a rogue PrometheusRule. This issue can have adverse effects on the platform monitoring stack, as the rule is rolled out cluster-wide when the label is applied.
Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
cert-manager: Denial of Service via Malicious PEM Data
CVE-2024-12401
4.4 - Medium
- December 12, 2024
A flaw was found in the cert-manager package. This flaw allows an attacker who can modify PEM data that the cert-manager reads, for example, in a Secret resource, to use large amounts of CPU in the cert-manager controller pod to effectively create a denial-of-service (DoS) vector for the cert-manager in the cluster.
Improper Input Validation
Uninitialized Buffer in Go FIPS OpenSSL May Cause False HMAC Match
CVE-2024-9355
6.5 - Medium
- October 01, 2024
A vulnerability was found in Golang FIPS OpenSSL. This flaw allows a malicious user to randomly cause an uninitialized buffer length variable with a zeroed buffer to be returned in FIPS mode. It may also be possible to force a false positive match between non-equal hashes when comparing a trusted computed hmac sum to an untrusted input sum if an attacker can send a zeroed buffer in place of a pre-computed sum. It is also possible to force a derived key to be all zeros instead of an unpredictable value. This may have follow-on implications for the Go TLS stack.
Use of Uninitialized Variable
Keycloak XSS via Malicious ACS URLs (CVE-2023-6717)
CVE-2023-6717
6 - Medium
- April 25, 2024
A flaw was found in the SAML client registration in Keycloak that could allow an administrator to register malicious JavaScript URIs as Assertion Consumer Service POST Binding URLs (ACS), posing a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) risk. This issue may allow a malicious admin in one realm or a client with registration access to target users in different realms or applications, executing arbitrary JavaScript in their contexts upon form submission. This can enable unauthorized access and harmful actions, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the complete KC instance.
XSS
Memory Leak in Go RSA (golang-fips/openssl) Leads to Resource Exhaustion
CVE-2024-1394
7.5 - High
- March 21, 2024
A memory leak flaw was found in Golang in the RSA encrypting/decrypting code, which might lead to a resource exhaustion vulnerability using attacker-controlled inputs. The memory leak happens in github.com/golang-fips/openssl/openssl/rsa.go#L113. The objects leaked are pkey and ctx. That function uses named return parameters to free pkey and ctx if there is an error initializing the context or setting the different properties. All return statements related to error cases follow the "return nil, nil, fail(...)" pattern, meaning that pkey and ctx will be nil inside the deferred function that should free them.
Memory Leak
OpenSSH <9.6 BPP handshake flaw allows integrity bypass (Terrapin attack)
CVE-2023-48795
5.9 - Medium
- December 18, 2023
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust.
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
HTTP/2 DoS via Stream Reset in nginx
CVE-2023-44487
7.5 - High
- October 10, 2023
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
Resource Exhaustion
A flaw was found in argocd
CVE-2021-3557
6.5 - Medium
- February 16, 2022
A flaw was found in argocd. Any unprivileged user is able to deploy argocd in their namespace and with the created ServiceAccount argocd-argocd-server, the unprivileged user is able to read all resources of the cluster including all secrets which might enable privilege escalations. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
Stay on top of Security Vulnerabilities
Want an email whenever new vulnerabilities are published for Red Hat Openshift Gitops or by Red Hat? Click the Watch button to subscribe.
