Jsrsasign Jsrsasignproject Jsrsasign

Do you want an email whenever new security vulnerabilities are reported in Jsrsasignproject Jsrsasign?

By the Year

In 2024 there have been 1 vulnerability in Jsrsasignproject Jsrsasign with an average score of 5.9 out of ten. Jsrsasign did not have any published security vulnerabilities last year. That is, 1 more vulnerability have already been reported in 2024 as compared to last year.

Year Vulnerabilities Average Score
2024 1 5.90
2023 0 0.00
2022 1 9.80
2021 1 9.10
2020 3 9.03
2019 0 0.00
2018 0 0.00

It may take a day or so for new Jsrsasign vulnerabilities to show up in the stats or in the list of recent security vulnerabilties. Additionally vulnerabilities may be tagged under a different product or component name.

Recent Jsrsasignproject Jsrsasign Security Vulnerabilities

Versions of the package jsrsasign before 11.0.0 are vulnerable to Observable Discrepancy via the RSA PKCS1.5 or RSAOAEP decryption process

CVE-2024-21484 5.9 - Medium - January 22, 2024

Versions of the package jsrsasign before 11.0.0 are vulnerable to Observable Discrepancy via the RSA PKCS1.5 or RSAOAEP decryption process. An attacker can decrypt ciphertexts by exploiting the Marvin security flaw. Exploiting this vulnerability requires the attacker to have access to a large number of ciphertexts encrypted with the same key. Workaround The vulnerability can be mitigated by finding and replacing RSA and RSAOAEP decryption with another crypto library.

Side Channel Attack

The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT signature with non Base64URL encoding special characters or number escaped characters may be validated as valid by mistake

CVE-2022-25898 9.8 - Critical - July 01, 2022

The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT signature with non Base64URL encoding special characters or number escaped characters may be validated as valid by mistake. Workaround: Validate JWS or JWT signature if it has Base64URL and dot safe string before executing JWS.verify() or JWS.verifyJWT() method.

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

In the jsrsasign package through 10.1.13 for Node.js, some invalid RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures are mistakenly recognized to be valid

CVE-2021-30246 9.1 - Critical - April 07, 2021

In the jsrsasign package through 10.1.13 for Node.js, some invalid RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures are mistakenly recognized to be valid. NOTE: there is no known practical attack.

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package before 8.0.17 for Node.js

CVE-2020-14968 9.8 - Critical - June 22, 2020

An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package before 8.0.17 for Node.js. Its RSASSA-PSS (RSA-PSS) implementation does not detect signature manipulation/modification by prepending '\0' bytes to a signature (it accepts these modified signatures as valid). An attacker can abuse this behavior in an application by creating multiple valid signatures where only one signature should exist. Also, an attacker might prepend these bytes with the goal of triggering memory corruption issues.

Buffer Overflow

An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package before 8.0.18 for Node.js

CVE-2020-14967 9.8 - Critical - June 22, 2020

An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package before 8.0.18 for Node.js. Its RSA PKCS1 v1.5 decryption implementation does not detect ciphertext modification by prepending '\0' bytes to ciphertexts (it decrypts modified ciphertexts without error). An attacker might prepend these bytes with the goal of triggering memory corruption issues.

Buffer Overflow

An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package through 8.0.18 for Node.js

CVE-2020-14966 7.5 - High - June 22, 2020

An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package through 8.0.18 for Node.js. It allows a malleability in ECDSA signatures by not checking overflows in the length of a sequence and '0' characters appended or prepended to an integer. The modified signatures are verified as valid. This could have a security-relevant impact if an application relied on a single canonical signature.

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

Stay on top of Security Vulnerabilities

Want an email whenever new vulnerabilities are published for NetApp Max Data or by Jsrsasignproject? Click the Watch button to subscribe.

subscribe