Hcl
Don't miss out!
Thousands of developers use stack.watch to stay informed.Get an email whenever new security vulnerabilities are reported in any Hcl product.
RSS Feeds for Hcl security vulnerabilities
Create a CVE RSS feed including security vulnerabilities found in Hcl products with stack.watch. Just hit watch, then grab your custom RSS feed url.
Products by Hcl Sorted by Most Security Vulnerabilities since 2018
By the Year
In 2026 there have been 102 vulnerabilities in Hcl with an average score of 4.4 out of ten. Last year, in 2025 Hcl had 39 security vulnerabilities published. That is, 63 more vulnerabilities have already been reported in 2026 as compared to last year. Last year, the average CVE base score was greater by 0.81
| Year | Vulnerabilities | Average Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 102 | 4.35 |
| 2025 | 39 | 5.16 |
| 2024 | 5 | 5.60 |
| 2023 | 1 | 5.30 |
It may take a day or so for new Hcl vulnerabilities to show up in the stats or in the list of recent security vulnerabilities. Additionally vulnerabilities may be tagged under a different product or component name.
Recent Hcl Security Vulnerabilities
| CVE | Date | Vulnerability | Products |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23564 | Jul 17, 2026 |
HCL Aftermarket EPC: Auth Bypass Password Disclosure via Email RequestHCL Aftermarket EPC is affected by Business Logic Vulnerability using which a non valid user of the application can obtain passwords from the server and redirect them to their own email address by manipulating the server's response. The application includes checks in the initial requests to verify the validity of the provided UserId, but similar validation is not applied to Email requests when sending passwords to user emails. |
|
| CVE-2026-56456 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXAnalytics Internal File Path Disclosure via Unhandled ErrorsHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Internal File Path Disclosure vulnerability. The application dashboard inadvertently leaks sensitive information regarding its internal file structure and directory paths through unhandled error messages, system logs, or debugging output, which could allow a remote attacker to map the underlying server environment and identify targets for further exploitation. |
|
| CVE-2026-56455 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXAnalytics Buffer Overflow Can Trigger DoSHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Buffer Overflow vulnerability that can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS). The application fails to properly validate input sizes, allowing an attacker to pass an excessive amount of information into a memory container, which can cause the system to crash or become unresponsive. To mitigate this flaw, comprehensive input length checks must be implemented and enforced on both the client and server sides. |
|
| CVE-2026-56454 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXAnalytics Deprecated TLS 1.0/1.1 Usage VulnerabilityHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. These legacy protocols contain numerous cryptographic design flaws that expose data to interception and decryption. To remediate this risk, the application must disable all support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, and exclusively enable support for secure protocols, specifically TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. |
|
| CVE-2026-56453 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXAnalytics Account Takeover via Response ManipulationHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Account Takeover via Response Manipulation vulnerability. A remote attacker can intercept and alter the contents of the server's HTTP responses before they reach the client application, allowing them to manipulate the authentication or authorization logic to bypass controls and gain unauthorized access to targeted user accounts. |
|
| CVE-2026-35145 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXAnalytics Missing HSTS Header Remote MitM VulnerabilityHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing HTTP Strict-Transport-Security Header vulnerability. The application fails to implement the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) policy within its responses, which could allow a remote attacker to downgrade the communication channel to an unencrypted connection (HTTP) and conduct man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. To remediate this, the application must include the "Strict-Transport-Security" header in all web application responses. |
|
| CVE-2026-35143 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXAnalytics Missing SameSite on Session Cookies CSRF RiskHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing SameSite Attribute vulnerability. The application fails to set the "SameSite" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to execute Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks if additional mitigations, such as Anti-CSRF tokens, are not implemented. |
|
| CVE-2026-35142 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXAnalytics IP Address Disclosure CVE-2026-35142HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Internal IP Address Disclosure vulnerability. The application includes internal IP address details within its generated server responses, which could allow a remote attacker to gather sensitive network topology information and use it to map the internal infrastructure for further targeted attacks. |
|
| CVE-2026-35141 | Jul 16, 2026 |
Login Replay Vulnerability in HCL DFXAnalyticsHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Login Replay Attack vulnerability. The application allows a remote attacker to intercept, delay, or fraudulently retransmit valid authentication data to achieve unauthorized access. To mitigate this risk, the application must implement a mechanism to include timestamps with every message, ensuring that messages exceeding a specific age threshold are automatically rejected by the recipient system. |
|
| CVE-2026-35140 | Jul 16, 2026 |
Missing Secure Attribute on Auth Session Cookie in HCL DFXAnalyticsHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing Secure Attribute in Encrypted Session (SSL) Cookie vulnerability. The application fails to set the "secure" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and capture sensitive cookies, session tokens, or credentials sent in cleartext over unencrypted channels. |
|
| CVE-2026-35147 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXServer Broken Auth via Direct APIHCL DFXServer is affected by a Broken Authentication vulnerability via direct API access. The application fails to verify the user's authentication status when accessing specific API endpoints, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to interact with the APIs and perform unauthorized actions without valid credentials. |
|
| CVE-2026-35149 | Jul 16, 2026 |
HCL DFXServer Auth Bypass via Server Response ManipHCL DFXServer is affected by an Authentication Bypass vulnerability via server response manipulation. An unauthorized user without valid credentials can exploit this flaw by intercepting and altering the server's authentication responses, allowing them to gain unauthorized access to the application without verification. |
|
| CVE-2026-35148 | Jul 16, 2026 |
Missing Access Control in HCL DFXServer API EndpointsHCL DFXServer is affected by a Missing Access Control vulnerability. This vulnerability states that certain endpoints are accessible without any form of authentication in another browser. This allows any network user to invoke these APIs and interact with the application without verification of their identity or authorization level. |
|
| CVE-2026-9007 | Jul 15, 2026 |
HCL Notes 12.0.2FP5HF8 XSS via Reflected User InputImproper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in HCL Notes from HCL Software allows reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Successful exploitation allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of another user. This issue affects HCL Notes: Release 12.0.2FP5HF8 on Linux 4.18.0-553.52.1.El8_10.X64_64#1. |
|
| CVE-2025-59872 | Jun 17, 2026 |
Unrestricted File Upload in HCL ZIE for Web (CVE-2025-59872)HCL ZIE for Web is affetced by an Unrestricted File Upload vulnerability, If the server is configured to execute code, then it may be possible to obtain command execution on the server by uploading a file known as a web shell, which allows you to execute arbitrary code or operating system commands. For this attack to be successful, the file needs to be uploaded inside the Webroot, and the server must be configured to execute the code |
|
| CVE-2025-62340 | Jun 17, 2026 |
HCL iControl Session Timeout FailureHCL iControl was affected by Inadequate Session Timeout vulnerability. The vulnerability involves a security risk where a web application fails to automatically terminate user sessions after a period of inactivity |
|
| CVE-2025-62338 | Jun 04, 2026 |
HCL BigFix Cloud LC Mgt: Input Validation Flaw Enables Info ExposureHCL BigFix Cloud Lifecycle Management is affected by lack of input validation. This low-level flaw allows unauthorized access and may lead to information exposure. |
|
| CVE-2025-59874 | Jun 04, 2026 |
CSP Directive Missing in HCL Hive Telco Obs Keycloak Web AppHCL Hive Telco Observability is affected by a Required directives missing from the CSP issue is detected in keycloak component of the web application. Missing essential directives can leave a site vulnerable. |
|
| CVE-2025-52606 | Jun 04, 2026 |
HCL iControl Weak Input Validation (WIV) VulnerabilityHCL iControl was affected by Weak Input Validation vulnerability. This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic. Received input that is expected to be of a certain type, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually of the expected type. |
|
| CVE-2025-52608 | Jun 04, 2026 |
HCL iControl Missing Cookie Attributes (Secure, SameSite)HCL iControl was affected by Missing Cookie Attributes vulnerability. It was observed that the application is missing several critical cookie attributes, including Secure and SameSite. And also path is set to root. |
|
| CVE-2025-52609 | Jun 04, 2026 |
HCL iControl XSS via Missing Security HeadersHCL iControl was affected by Missing Security Headers vulnerability. which lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks by enabling the built-in XSS filtering mechanisms of modern web browsers. |
|
| CVE-2025-52611 | Jun 04, 2026 |
HCL iControl v4.0.0 stack trace disclosure via undefined JS propertyHCL iControl v4.0.0 was affected by Unhandled Exception - Stack Trace Disclosure vulnerability. The error occurs due to an undefined property being accessed in the application's JavaScript code. Specifically, the code attempts to read the property dashboard key from an object that is undefined. This issue likely stems from one of the following: A missing or improperly initialized object. |
|
| CVE-2025-52612 | Jun 04, 2026 |
Reflected XSS via CSV Export in HCL iControlHCL iControl was affected by Export CSV - CSV Injection vulnerability. It is vulnerable to a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability. This was caused by an insufficient sanitation of input parameters. . |
|
| CVE-2024-42206 | Jun 02, 2026 |
CVE-2024-42206: HCL iReflection Web App Uses Outdated Vulnerable ComponentsHCL iReflection Third party vulnerable and outdated components issue was detected in the web application |
|
| CVE-2025-31985 | May 20, 2026 |
HCL BigFix SM X-Content-Type-Options Header Misconfig - Browser MIME SniffingHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration due to a missing or insecure X-Content-Type-Options header. This could allow browsers to perform MIME-type sniffing, potentially causing malicious content to be interpreted and executed incorrectly. |
|
| CVE-2025-31973 | May 20, 2026 |
Insecure Base Image Use in HCL BigFix Service ManagementHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is susceptible to a Configuration 'Insecure Use of Base Image Version'. Using outdated or insecure base images may introduce known vulnerabilities, potentially increasing the risk of exploitation in the application environment. |
|
| CVE-2025-62305 | May 14, 2026 |
OOB Disclosure in HCL AION (CVE-2025-62305)HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain operations may trigger out-of-band interactions, potentially resulting in unintended disclosure of sensitive information. Such behaviour may allow exposure of data to external systems under specific conditions. |
|
| CVE-2025-62317 | May 14, 2026 |
HCL AION Sensitive Data in URL Parameters DisclosureHCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where sensitive information may be included in URL parameters. Passing sensitive data in URLs may expose it through browser history, logs, or intermediary systems, potentially leading to unintended information disclosure under certain conditions. |
|
| CVE-2025-62308 | May 14, 2026 |
Sensitive Backend Info Disclosure in HCL AIONHCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where sensitive backend infrastructure details may be exposed. Exposure of such information could reveal internal system architecture or configuration details, which may potentially assist in further analysis or targeted actions under certain conditions |
|
| CVE-2025-62309 | May 14, 2026 |
HCL AION Autocomplete Info Disclosure via Browser CachingHCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where auto-complete functionality is enabled for certain input fields. This may allow sensitive information to be stored in the browser, potentially leading to unintended exposure under specific conditions. |
|
| CVE-2025-62312 | May 14, 2026 |
HCL AION Basic Auth Token Leak VulnerabilityHCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where basic authorization tokens are used for authentication. Use of basic authorization mechanisms may expose credentials to potential interception or misuse, especially if not combined with secure transmission practices. |
|
| CVE-2025-62316 | May 14, 2026 |
HCL AION HTTP Response Header Misconfig Weakens Browser SecurityHCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain security-related HTTP response headers are not properly configured. Absence of these headers may reduce the effectiveness of browser-based security controls and could expose the application to limited security risks under specific conditions. |
|
| CVE-2025-62313 | May 14, 2026 |
HCL AION Brute-Force Access via Missing Auth ThrottleHCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where adequate protections against brute-force attempts are not enforced. This may allow repeated authentication attempts, potentially leading to unauthorized access or account compromise under certain conditions. |
|
| CVE-2025-62311 | May 14, 2026 |
HCL AION Backend Service Data Exposure via Insecure HTTPHCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where backend service details may be transmitted over insecure HTTP channels. This may expose sensitive information to potential interception or unauthorized access during transmission under certain conditions |
|
| CVE-2025-62310 | May 14, 2026 |
Unencrypted Data Exposure in HCL AION Encryption Not EnforcedHCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where encryption is not enforced for certain data transmissions or operations. This may expose sensitive information to potential interception or unauthorized access under specific conditions. |
|
| CVE-2024-30151 | May 06, 2026 |
Broken Access Control in HCL BigFix SM (SX) Enables Privilege EscalationHCL BigFix Service Management (SX) is affected by a Broken Access Control vulnerability leading to privilege escalation. This could allow unauthorized users to gain elevated privileges, bypassing intended access restrictions. This may result in exposure of sensitive data or unauthorized system modifications |
|
| CVE-2025-31960 | May 06, 2026 |
Info Exposure via Unhandled Exception in HCL BigFix SM ReportingHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is vulnerable to information exposure due to improper error handling within its reporting module. It was observed that supplying an invalid or out-of-range value to the consumer_company parameter during a report-viewing request causes the application to trigger an unhandled exception. |
|
| CVE-2025-31974 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix SM Root FS Read-Only Misconfig allows critical changesHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is susceptible to a Root File System Not Mounted as Read-Only. An improperly configured root file system may allow unintended modifications to critical system components, potentially increasing the risk of system compromise or unauthorized changes. |
|
| CVE-2025-31975 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix SM InfoDisclosure: Server Banner Leak Reveals VersionsHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by an Information Disclosure Server Banner issue was identified. Exposed server banners may reveal software versions and system details, potentially aiding attackers in targeting known vulnerabilities. |
|
| CVE-2025-52613 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix SM WSGI Server Vulnerability Enables Unauthorized AccessHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by use of a vulnerable WSGI Server was identified. Deploying an outdated or insecure WSGI server may expose the application to known security weaknesses, potentially increasing the risk of exploitation and unauthorized access. |
|
| CVE-2025-31976 | May 06, 2026 |
Insufficiently Protected Credentials in HCL BigFix SMHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is vulnerable to insufficiently protected credentials for a short duration while communicating with a backend, internal application which could allow an attacker to potentially misuse them, if exfiltrated. . |
|
| CVE-2025-31978 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix SM CSV/XLS/XLSX Sanitization Bypass (CVE-2025-31978)HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) does not adequately sanitize or safely render spreadsheet files (CSV, XLS, XLSX) before processing or distributing them. An attacker could populate data fields which, when saved to a CSV file, may attempt information exfiltration or other malicious activity when automatically executed by the spreadsheet software. Note that current versions of Excel warn users of untrusted content. |
|
| CVE-2025-31959 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix SM Exif Metadata Exposure VulnerabilityHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) application fails to strip EXIF metadata from uploaded images. This could lead to confidentiality and privacy risks if sensitive location information is unintentionally shared. . |
|
| CVE-2025-31982 | May 06, 2026 |
Unlinked Directory Access Enables Information Disclosure in HCL BigFix SMHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) had directories that were not linked or publicly visible but could be accessed directly. This could allow an increased risk of information disclosure or misuse of sensitive functionality. |
|
| CVE-2025-31984 | May 06, 2026 |
BigFix SM MIME-Type Sniffing via Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration due to a missing or insecure X-Content-Type-Options header. This could allow browsers to perform MIME-type sniffing, potentially causing malicious content to be interpreted and executed incorrectly. |
|
| CVE-2025-31983 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix SM CSP Header XSS VulnerabilityHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration vulnerability due to CSP header. This could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts increasing the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) and potential exposure of sensitive information. |
|
| CVE-2025-31957 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix SM CSRF Enables Unauthorized ChangesHHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a CrossSite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This could lead to unauthorized changes or exposure of sensitive data. |
|
| CVE-2025-62345 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix RunBookAI Input Handling Vulnerability (CVE-2025-62345)HCL BigFix RunBookAI is affected by a Continued availability of Less-Secure Input Text Vulnerability . A component contains a security weakness in its input handling implementation, increasing the risk of misconfiguration and operational errors. |
|
| CVE-2025-31951 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL BigFix RunBookAI Command Smuggling via Unvalidated InputHCL BigFix RunBookAI is affected by a Unvalidated Command Input / Potential Command Smuggling vulnerability. A flaw in a component's input handling was identified that could permit unauthorized command execution. |
|
| CVE-2025-59854 | May 06, 2026 |
HCL DFXAnalytics: Vulnerable X-XSS-Protection Header (CSP Bypass)HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Insecure Security Header Configuration vulnerability where the application utilizes the outdated X-XSS-Protection header, which could allow an attacker to exploit browser-specific rendering flaws or bypass security controls that should instead be managed by a robust Content Security Policy (CSP). |